Childhood Outcomes in Children with and without Cardiac Echogenic Foci: An Electronic Birth Cohort Study in Wales, UK

• Published in: Children (Basel) Vol. 10; no. 7; p. 1233
• Main Authors: Hurt, Lisa, Uzun, Orhan, Morris, Susan, Bethel, Jackie, Evans, Annette, Seaborne, Michael, Daniel, Rhian, Brophy, Sinead, Paranjothy, Shantini
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01-07-2023; MDPI
• Subjects: cardiac echogenic foci; Cohort analysis; cohort study; Comparative analysis; congenital cardiac anomalies; Congenital diseases; Data collection; Datasets; Down syndrome; Genetic disorders; hospital admissions; Hospitals; Parenting; Patient admissions; Patient outcomes; Population; population-based; Population-based studies; Pregnancy; Tumors; Ultrasonic imaging; Womens health; United Kingdom; United Kingdom > UK; Wales; congenital cardiac anomalies; cohort study; cardiac echogenic foci; hospital admissions; population-based
• ISSN: 2227-9067; 2227-9067
• DOI: 10.3390/children10071233

There is uncertainty about outcomes associated with cardiac echogenic foci (CEF) seen at the midtrimester ultrasound scan because of limited population-based follow-up data. This can lead to unnecessary invasive testing and significant parental anxiety. We analysed data from a cohort study, The Welsh Study of Mothers and Babies, to examine whether children with CEF had more adverse outcomes during childhood compared with children without CEF. Children born between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2011 were followed until 31 January 2018, migration out of Wales, or death. The primary outcome was cardiac hospital admissions, defined a priori by an expert steering group. Secondary outcomes included congenital cardiac anomalies, and hospital admissions for other causes. There was no evidence of an association between isolated CEF and cardiac hospital admissions (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-2.25,
value 0.768), or with congenital cardiac anomalies. There was a small increased risk of a respiratory admission with isolated CEF (hazard ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.54,
value 0.020). Further research is needed on features of CEF, such as location or number, to fully understand the clinical significance of these findings.