Restoration of Cenozoic deformation in Asia and the size of Greater India
A long‐standing problem in the geological evolution of the India‐Asia collision zone is how and where convergence between India and Asia was accommodated since collision. Proposed collision ages vary from 65 to 35 Ma, although most data sets are consistent with collision being underway by 50 Ma. Pla...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tectonics (Washington, D.C.) Vol. 30; no. 5 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Washington
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-10-2011
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A long‐standing problem in the geological evolution of the India‐Asia collision zone is how and where convergence between India and Asia was accommodated since collision. Proposed collision ages vary from 65 to 35 Ma, although most data sets are consistent with collision being underway by 50 Ma. Plate reconstructions show that since 50 Ma ∼2400–3200 km (west to east) of India‐Asia convergence occurred, much more than the 450–900 km of documented Himalayan shortening. Current models therefore suggest that most post‐50 Ma convergence was accommodated north of the Indus‐Yarlung suture zone. We review kinematic data and construct an updated restoration of Cenozoic Asian deformation to test this assumption. We show that geologic studies have documented 600–750 km of N‐S Cenozoic shortening across, and north of, the Tibetan Plateau. The Pamir‐Hindu Kush region accommodated ∼1050 km of N‐S convergence. Geological evidence from Tibet is inconsistent with models that propose 750–1250 km of eastward extrusion of Indochina. Approximately 250 km of Indochinese extrusion from 30 to 20 Ma of Indochina suggested by SE Asia reconstructions can be reconciled by dextral transpression in eastern Tibet. We use our reconstruction to calculate the required size of Greater India as a function of collision age. Even with a 35 Ma collision age, the size of Greater India is 2–3 times larger than Himalayan shortening. For a 50 Ma collision, the size of Greater India from west to east is ∼1350–2600 km, consistent with robust paleomagnetic data from upper Cretaceous‐Paleocene Tethyan Himalayan strata. These estimates for the size of Greater India far exceed documented shortening in the Himalaya. We conclude that most of Greater India was consumed by subduction or underthrusting, without leaving a geological record that has been recognized at the surface.
Key Points
Post‐50 Ma Asian deformation north of India is 600–1050 km from east to west
The required size of Greater India is 1350–2600 km with a 50 Ma collision
Himalayan shortening greately underestimates Indian plate subduction since 50 Ma |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-P6S6047X-B ArticleID:2011TC002908 istex:1476F008F7F6FA0509E1593715EAB73E880611DE ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0278-7407 1944-9194 |
DOI: | 10.1029/2011TC002908 |