Clinical application and improvement of a CNN‐based autosegmentation model for clinical target volumes in cervical cancer radiotherapy

• Published in: Journal of applied clinical medical physics Vol. 22; no. 11; pp. 115 - 125
• Main Authors: Chang, Yankui, Wang, Zhi, Peng, Zhao, Zhou, Jieping, Pi, Yifei, Xu, X. George, Pei, Xi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden Massachusetts John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-11-2021; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Accuracy; adaptive improvement; autosegmentation; Cancer therapies; Cervical cancer; clinical target volumes; Datasets; deep learning; Experiments; Neural networks; Physicians; Radiation Oncology Physics; Radiation therapy; Vagina; China
• ISSN: 1526-9914; 1526-9914
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13440

Objective
Clinical target volume (CTV) autosegmentation for cervical cancer is desirable for radiation therapy. Data heterogeneity and interobserver variability (IOV) limit the clinical adaptability of such methods. The adaptive method is proposed to improve the adaptability of CNN‐based autosegmentation of CTV contours in cervical cancer.
Methods
This study included 400 cervical cancer treatment planning cases with CTV delineated by radiation oncologists from three hospitals. The datasets were divided into five subdatasets (80 cases each). The cases in datasets 1, 2, and 3 were delineated by physicians A, B, and C, respectively. The cases in datasets 4 and 5 were delineated by multiple physicians. Dataset 1 was divided into training (50 cases), validation (10 cases), and testing (20 cases) cohorts, and they were used to construct the pretrained model. Datasets 2–5 were regarded as host datasets to evaluate the accuracy of the pretrained model. In the adaptive process, the pretrained model was fine‐tuned to measure improvements by gradually adding more training cases selected from the host datasets. The accuracy of the autosegmentation model on each host dataset was evaluated using the corresponding test cases. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD_95) were used to evaluate the accuracy.
Results
Before and after adaptive improvements, the average DSC values on the host datasets were 0.818 versus 0.882, 0.763 versus 0.810, 0.727 versus 0.772, and 0.679 versus 0.789, which are improvements of 7.82%, 6.16%, 6.19%, and 16.05%, respectively. The average HD_95 values were 11.143 mm versus 6.853 mm, 22.402 mm versus 14.076 mm, 28.145 mm versus 16.437 mm, and 33.034 mm versus 16.441 mm, which are improvements of 37.94%, 37.17%, 41.60%, and 50.23%, respectively.
Conclusion
The proposed method improved the adaptability of the CNN‐based autosegmentation model when applied to host datasets.