Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery
The neurokinin1 antagonist aprepitant is effective for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. We compared aprepitant with ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Nine hundred and twenty-two patients receiving general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery w...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 99; no. 2; pp. 202 - 211 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01-08-2007
Oxford University Press Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The neurokinin1 antagonist aprepitant is effective for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. We compared aprepitant with ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Nine hundred and twenty-two patients receiving general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery were assigned to receive a single preoperative dose of oral aprepitant 40 mg, oral aprepitant 125 mg, or i.v. ondansetron 4 mg in a randomized, double-blind trial. Vomiting episodes, use of rescue therapy, and nausea severity (verbal rating scale) were documented for 48 h after surgery. Primary efficacy endpoints were complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy) 0–24 h after surgery and no vomiting 0–24 h after surgery. The secondary endpoint was no vomiting 0–48 h after surgery.
Aprepitant at both doses was non-inferior to ondansetron for complete response 0–24 h after surgery (64% for aprepitant 40 mg, 63% for aprepitant 125 mg, and 55% for ondansetron, lower bound of 1-sided 95% CI > 0.65), superior to ondansetron for no vomiting 0–24 h after surgery (84% for aprepitant 40 mg, 86% for aprepitant 125 mg, and 71% for ondansetron; P < 0.001), and superior for no vomiting 0–48 h after surgery (82% for aprepitant, 40 mg, 85% for aprepitant, 125 mg, and 66% for ondansetron; P < 0.001). The distribution of peak nausea scores was lower in both aprepitant groups vs ondansetron (P < 0.05).
Aprepitant was non-inferior to ondansetron in achieving complete response for 24 h after surgery. Aprepitant was significantly more effective than ondansetron for preventing vomiting at 24 and 48 h after surgery, and in reducing nausea severity in the first 48 h after surgery. Aprepitant was generally well tolerated. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:aem133 ark:/67375/HXZ-0CSTGLVF-V Declaration of interest. This study was funded by Merck and Co., Inc. (Sponsor), West Point, PA 19486, USA. Drs Diemunsch, Gan, Philip, Girao, Eberhart, Irwin, Pueyo and Chelly received funding from Merck to perform the study. Drs Carides, Reiss, Evans and Lawson are employees of Merck and hold stock options or stock in Merck. istex:91007FCF2435D233EFB55B55DD78689DB95C9E08 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-0912 1471-6771 |
DOI: | 10.1093/bja/aem133 |