Calm Temperament Improves Reproductive Performance of Beef Cows

• Published in: Reproduction in domestic animals Vol. 49; no. 6; pp. 1063 - 1067
• Main Authors: Kasimanickam, R, Asay, M, Schroeder, S, Kasimanickam, V, Gay, JM, Kastelic, JP, Hall, JB, Whittier, WD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany P. Parey Scientific Publishers 01-12-2014; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: Angus; Animal behavior; Animal reproduction; Animals; beef; beef cows; Behavior, Animal; Body Composition; body condition; breeding; breeding season; bulls; Cattle; Cattle - physiology; Female; gait; Pregnancy; pregnancy rate; profitability; Reproduction - physiology; reproductive performance; sexually transmitted diseases; Stress, Physiological; temperament; Temperament - physiology; trotting
• ISSN: 0936-6768; 1439-0531
• DOI: 10.1111/rda.12436

Profitability of a beef operation is determined by the proportion of cows attaining pregnancy early in the breeding season and those that are pregnant at the end of breeding season. Many factors, including temperament, contribute to those reproductive parameters. The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of temperament on reproductive performance of beef cows. In Experiment 1, Angus and Angus‐cross beef cows (n = 1546) from eight locations were assigned a body condition score (BCS; 1 = emaciated; 9 = obese) and chute exit and gait score (1 = slow exit, walk; calm temperament; 2 = jump, trot or run; excitable temperament). Cows were grouped with bulls (1 : 25 to 1 : 30; with satisfactory breeding potential and free of venereal disease) for an 85‐day breeding season. Pregnancy status and stage of gestation were determined (transrectal palpation) 35 days after the end of the breeding season. Controlling for BCS (p < 0.01) and handling facility (p < 0.0001) and handling facility by temperament score interaction (p < 0.001), breeding season pregnancy rate was lower in excited versus calm cows [88.6% (798/901) vs 94.1% (607/645); p < 0.001]. Cows with an excitable temperament took 24 more days to become pregnant compared to calm cows (median days to pregnancy, 35 vs 59 days; p < 0.0001). In Experiment 2, Angus and Angus‐cross beef cows (n = 1407) from 8 locations were assigned scores for body condition and chute exit and gait (as described in Experiment 1) and assigned to bulls (breeding sound and free of venereal disease; 1 : 25 to 1 : 30) for 85 days. Pregnancy status was determined by transrectal palpation at 2 and 6 months after the onset of the breeding season. Controlling for BCS (p < 0.05), pregnancy loss was higher in excited versus calm cows [5.5% (36/651) vs 3.2% (20/623), p < 0.0001]. In conclusion, beef cows with an excitable temperament had significantly lower reproductive performance than calmer cows. The modified two‐point chute exit–gait scoring method was repeatable and identified cattle with an excitable temperament.