Accessory Nerve Function After Modified Radical and Lateral Neck Dissections

Objectives: Evaluate preoperative and postoperative electrophysiological changes related to the accessory nerve with reference to dissection technique, modified radical neck dissection, and lateral neck dissection. Study Design: Prospective electrophysiological analysis of accessory nerve function i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope Vol. 110; no. 1; pp. 73 - 77
Main Authors: Köybasioglu, Ahmet, Tokcaer, Ayse Bora, Uslu, S. Sabri, Ileri, Fikret, Beder, Levent, Özbilen, Suat
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-01-2000
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives: Evaluate preoperative and postoperative electrophysiological changes related to the accessory nerve with reference to dissection technique, modified radical neck dissection, and lateral neck dissection. Study Design: Prospective electrophysiological analysis of accessory nerve function in a total of 20 laryngeal carcinoma patients after neck dissection, 12 being lateral neck dissection (4 bilateral) and 8 being modified radical neck dissection. Methods: Distal latencies, compound muscle action potentials, and electromyography findings were investigated before surgery and, in early and late postoperative periods in 20 laryngeal carcinoma patients. Results were evaluated by Student t test and χ2 test for intragroup and intergroup differences. Results: In the lateral neck dissection group, postoperative distal latencies were longer, without statistical significance, whereas in the modified radical neck dissection group postoperative latencies were statistically longer. Postoperative compound muscle action potentials were significantly lower in both groups. Electromyographic work‐up showed deterioration in early postoperative periods and improvement in late postoperative periods. When intergroup differences were compared, both postoperative compound muscle action potential and electromyographic findings were worse in the lateral neck dissection group. Conclusions: The accessory nerve function after modified radical neck dissection is better than function after lateral neck dissection because of increased stress applied to the nerve during retraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle for achievement of a better exposed surgical field in lateral neck dissection.
Bibliography:This study was carried out in Gazi University Medical Center, 06510 Besevler, Ankara, Turkey.
istex:9DE98E6A780036C597522B4757CA948172CCBA7C
ArticleID:LARY5541100114
ark:/67375/WNG-P5XSR3Q1-8
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1097/00005537-200001000-00014