Comparing Implementation of Internet Diffusion in the United States and France: Policies, Beliefs, and Institutions

• Published in: The Review of policy research Vol. 25; no. 6; pp. 563 - 578
• Main Authors: Amougou, Jules, Larson, James S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01-12-2008; Policy Studies Organization
• Subjects: advocacy coalition framework; belief systems; Coalitions; Comparative analysis; Comparative studies; Cyberlaw; Diffusion; dirigisme policy; France; Global economy; Globalization; Implementation; Industry; Information society; Internet; Management; policy communities; Policy making; Social aspects; top-down implementation; United States of America; France; United States; United States > US
• ISSN: 1541-132X; 1541-1338
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00362.x

Comparing Internet diffusion policies in the United States and France from an implementation perspective brings to light institutional and historical differences, even though both countries used the same top‐down approach. We find that France not only followed the technological lead of the United States in information technology but also emulated some of its more business‐oriented approaches in the implementation of the Internet, despite its own longstanding tradition of government intervention in industrial and commercial matters. This policy shift appears to be spurred by the global economy. Traditionally state‐controlled national economies are now increasingly leveraging private interests for successful industrial policy. When applying Sabatier and Jenkins‐Smith's advocacy coalition framework to the American and French diffusion of the Internet, we find policy communities actually expanding to private and public actors, including industry captains, legislators, and civil servants. These subsystems work together through classic lawmaking and lobbying under technological and economic constraints.