Multiple linear regression to estimate time-frequency electrophysiological responses in single trials

• Published in: NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 111; pp. 442 - 453
• Main Authors: Hu, L, Zhang, Z G, Mouraux, A, Iannetti, G D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Limited 01-05-2015; Academic Press
• Subjects: Adult; Cerebral Cortex - physiology; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Electroencephalography; Electroencephalography - methods; Evoked Potentials - physiology; Female; Fourier transforms; Humans; Lasers; Male; Methods; Neurosciences; Nociception - physiology; Pain; Physiology; Principal components analysis; Regression Analysis; Signal processing; Studies; Young Adult; Time-frequency analysis; Neuronal oscillations; Multiple linear regression; Event-related desynchronization (ERD); Single-trial analysis; Event-related synchronization (ERS)
• ISSN: 1053-8119; 1095-9572
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.062

Transient sensory, motor or cognitive event elicit not only phase-locked event-related potentials (ERPs) in the ongoing electroencephalogram (EEG), but also induce non-phase-locked modulations of ongoing EEG oscillations. These modulations can be detected when single-trial waveforms are analysed in the time-frequency domain, and consist in stimulus-induced decreases (event-related desynchronization, ERD) or increases (event-related synchronization, ERS) of synchrony in the activity of the underlying neuronal populations. ERD and ERS reflect changes in the parameters that control oscillations in neuronal networks and, depending on the frequency at which they occur, represent neuronal mechanisms involved in cortical activation, inhibition and binding. ERD and ERS are commonly estimated by averaging the time-frequency decomposition of single trials. However, their trial-to-trial variability that can reflect physiologically-important information is lost by across-trial averaging. Here, we aim to (1) develop novel approaches to explore single-trial parameters (including latency, frequency and magnitude) of ERP/ERD/ERS; (2) disclose the relationship between estimated single-trial parameters and other experimental factors (e.g., perceived intensity). We found that (1) stimulus-elicited ERP/ERD/ERS can be correctly separated using principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition with Varimax rotation on the single-trial time-frequency distributions; (2) time-frequency multiple linear regression with dispersion term (TF-MLRd) enhances the signal-to-noise ratio of ERP/ERD/ERS in single trials, and provides an unbiased estimation of their latency, frequency, and magnitude at single-trial level; (3) these estimates can be meaningfully correlated with each other and with other experimental factors at single-trial level (e.g., perceived stimulus intensity and ERP magnitude). The methods described in this article allow exploring fully non-phase-locked stimulus-induced cortical oscillations, obtaining single-trial estimate of response latency, frequency, and magnitude. This permits within-subject statistical comparisons, correlation with pre-stimulus features, and integration of simultaneously-recorded EEG and fMRI.