Signal acquisition and analysis of ambulatory electromyographic recordings for the assessment of sleep bruxism: A scoping review

• Published in: Journal of oral rehabilitation Vol. 48; no. 7; pp. 846 - 871
• Main Authors: Thymi, Magdalini, Lobbezoo, Frank, Aarab, Ghizlane, Ahlberg, Jari, Baba, Kazuyoshi, Carra, Maria Clotilde, Gallo, Luigi M., De Laat, Antoon, Manfredini, Daniele, Lavigne, Gilles, Svensson, Peter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-07-2021; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: ambulatory electromyographic device; Bruxism; Electromyography; Humans; limited channel device; Literature reviews; Masseter Muscle; Mastication; masticatory muscle activity; Masticatory Muscles; Polysomnography; Review; Semantics; Signal processing; Sleep; sleep bruxism; Sleep Bruxism - diagnosis; surface electromyography; ambulatory electromyographic device; masticatory muscle activity; sleep bruxism; surface electromyography; limited channel device
• ISSN: 0305-182X; 1365-2842; 1365-2842
• DOI: 10.1111/joor.13170

Background
Ambulatory electromyographic (EMG) devices are increasingly being used in sleep bruxism studies. EMG signal acquisition, analysis and scoring methods vary between studies. This may impact comparability of studies and the assessment of sleep bruxism in patients.
Objectives
(a) To provide an overview of EMG signal acquisition and analysis methods of recordings from limited‐channel ambulatory EMG devices for the assessment of sleep bruxism; and (b) to provide an overview of outcome measures used in sleep bruxism literature utilising such devices.
Method
A scoping review of the literature was performed. Online databases PubMed and Semantics Scholar were searched for studies published in English until 7 October 2020. Data on five categories were extracted: recording hardware, recording logistics, signal acquisition, signal analysis and sleep bruxism outcomes.
Results
Seventy‐eight studies were included, published between 1977 and 2020. Recording hardware was generally well described. Reports of participant instructions in device handling and of dealing with failed recordings were often lacking. Basic elements of signal acquisition, for example amplifications factors, impedance and bandpass settings, and signal analysis, for example rectification, signal processing and additional filtering, were underreported. Extensive variability was found for thresholds used to characterise sleep bruxism events. Sleep bruxism outcomes varied, but typically represented frequency, duration and/or intensity of masticatory muscle activity (MMA).
Conclusion
Adequate and standardised reporting of recording procedures is highly recommended. In future studies utilising ambulatory EMG devices, the focus may need to shift from the concept of scoring sleep bruxism events to that of scoring the whole spectrum of MMA.