Randomized clinical trial of mast cell inhibition in patients with a medium-sized abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is thought to develop as a result of inflammatory processes in the aortic wall. In particular, mast cells are believed to play a central role. The AORTA trial was undertaken to investigate whether the mast cell inhibitor, pemirolast, could retard the growth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of surgery Vol. 102; no. 8; pp. 894 - 901
Main Authors: Sillesen, H., Eldrup, N., Hultgren, R., Lindeman, J., Bredahl, K., Thompson, M., Wanhainen, A., Wingren, U., Swedenborg, J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-07-2015
Oxford University Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is thought to develop as a result of inflammatory processes in the aortic wall. In particular, mast cells are believed to play a central role. The AORTA trial was undertaken to investigate whether the mast cell inhibitor, pemirolast, could retard the growth of medium‐sized AAAs. In preclinical and clinical trials, pemirolast has been shown to inhibit antigen‐induced allergic reactions. Methods Inclusion criteria for the trial were patients with an AAA of 39–49 mm in diameter on ultrasound imaging. Among exclusion criteria were previous aortic surgery, diabetes mellitus, and severe concomitant disease with a life expectancy of less than 2 years. Included patients were treated with 10, 25 or 40 mg pemirolast, or matching placebo for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in aortic diameter as measured from leading edge adventitia at the anterior wall to leading edge adventitia at the posterior wall in systole. All ultrasound scans were read in a central imaging laboratory. Results Some 326 patients (mean age 70·8 years; 88·0 per cent men) were included in the trial. The overall mean growth rate was 2·42 mm during the 12‐month study. There was no statistically significant difference in growth between patients receiving placebo and those in the three dose groups of pemirolast. Similarly, there were no differences in adverse events. Conclusion Treatment with pemirolast did not retard the growth of medium‐sized AAAs. Registration number: NCT01354184 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov). No effect
Bibliography:ArticleID:BJS9824
FigS1 Relative change in C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration from baseline to end of study for the four treatment groups. Pem, pemirolastTableS1 Relative change in biomarkers from baseline to end of study for the four treatment groupsTableS2 Adverse events in the four study groups
istex:A904C1477D9DA575321093276701ED44582C4BBB
ark:/67375/WNG-39SCX0XD-5
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
1365-2168
DOI:10.1002/bjs.9824