Randomized clinical trial of mast cell inhibition in patients with a medium-sized abdominal aortic aneurysm
Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is thought to develop as a result of inflammatory processes in the aortic wall. In particular, mast cells are believed to play a central role. The AORTA trial was undertaken to investigate whether the mast cell inhibitor, pemirolast, could retard the growth...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of surgery Vol. 102; no. 8; pp. 894 - 901 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01-07-2015
Oxford University Press |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is thought to develop as a result of inflammatory processes in the aortic wall. In particular, mast cells are believed to play a central role. The AORTA trial was undertaken to investigate whether the mast cell inhibitor, pemirolast, could retard the growth of medium‐sized AAAs. In preclinical and clinical trials, pemirolast has been shown to inhibit antigen‐induced allergic reactions.
Methods
Inclusion criteria for the trial were patients with an AAA of 39–49 mm in diameter on ultrasound imaging. Among exclusion criteria were previous aortic surgery, diabetes mellitus, and severe concomitant disease with a life expectancy of less than 2 years. Included patients were treated with 10, 25 or 40 mg pemirolast, or matching placebo for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in aortic diameter as measured from leading edge adventitia at the anterior wall to leading edge adventitia at the posterior wall in systole. All ultrasound scans were read in a central imaging laboratory.
Results
Some 326 patients (mean age 70·8 years; 88·0 per cent men) were included in the trial. The overall mean growth rate was 2·42 mm during the 12‐month study. There was no statistically significant difference in growth between patients receiving placebo and those in the three dose groups of pemirolast. Similarly, there were no differences in adverse events.
Conclusion
Treatment with pemirolast did not retard the growth of medium‐sized AAAs. Registration number: NCT01354184 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
No effect |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:BJS9824 FigS1 Relative change in C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration from baseline to end of study for the four treatment groups. Pem, pemirolastTableS1 Relative change in biomarkers from baseline to end of study for the four treatment groupsTableS2 Adverse events in the four study groups istex:A904C1477D9DA575321093276701ED44582C4BBB ark:/67375/WNG-39SCX0XD-5 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-1323 1365-2168 1365-2168 |
DOI: | 10.1002/bjs.9824 |