Effect of timing of coronary revascularization in patients with post-infectious myocardial infarction

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 8; p. e0272258
• Main Authors: Tsai, Chuan-Tsai, Lu, Ya-Wen, Chou, Ruey-Hsing, Kuo, Chin-Sung, Huang, Po-Hsun, Wu, Cheng-Hsueh, Huang, Shao-Sung
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 18-08-2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Acute coronary syndrome; Age; Angioplasty; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular disease; Care and treatment; Complications and side effects; Coronary artery; Coronary artery bypass; Coronary artery disease; Coronary vessels; Diabetes; Heart attack; Heart attacks; Heart diseases; Heart surgery; Hemodynamics; Infection; Infections; Ischemia; Laboratories; Medical imaging; Medical prognosis; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mortality; Myocardial infarction; Patient outcomes; Patients; Physicians; Risk factors; Sepsis; Statistics; Tertiary; Thrombosis; Transluminal angioplasty; Vein & artery diseases; Ventilators; Taiwan
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272258

Acute infection is a well-known provocative factor of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Prognosis is worse when it is associated with sepsis. Coronary revascularization is reported to provide benefit in these patients; however, the optimal timing remains uncertain. This retrospective study was performed at a tertiary center in Taipei from January 2010 to December 2017. 1931 patients received coronary revascularization indicated for AMI. Among these, 239 patients were hospitalized for acute infection but later developed AMI. Patients with either an ST-elevation myocardial infarct or the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease were excluded. Revascularization was performed via either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). We defined early and delayed revascularization groups if it was performed within or after 24 hours of the diagnosis of AMI, respectively. We evaluated whether the timing of revascularization altered 30-day and one-year all-cause mortality. At one month, 24 (26%) patients died in early revascularization group and 32 (22%) patients in delayed revascularization group. At one year, 40 (43%) and 59 (40%) patients died on early and delayed revascularization groups respectively. Early revascularization did not result in lower 30-day all-cause mortality (P = 0.424), and one-year all-cause mortality (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.935; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.626-1.397, P = 0.742) than delay revascularization. Timing of coronary revascularization of post infectious acute coronary syndrome may be arranged according to individual risk category as those without sepsis.