Predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor response in urothelial cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are commonly used to treat patients with advanced urothelial cancer. However, a significant number of patients do not respond to ICI, and the lack of validated predictive biomarkers impedes the success of the ICI strategy alone or in combination with chemotherapy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Vol. 15; p. 17588359231192402
Main Authors: Parent, Pauline, Marcq, Gautier, Adeleke, Sola, Turpin, Anthony, Boussios, Stergios, Rassy, Elie, Penel, Nicolas
Format: Book Review Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01-01-2023
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Journals
SAGE Publishing
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are commonly used to treat patients with advanced urothelial cancer. However, a significant number of patients do not respond to ICI, and the lack of validated predictive biomarkers impedes the success of the ICI strategy alone or in combination with chemotherapy or targeted therapies. In addition, some patients experience potentially severe adverse events with limited clinical benefit. Therefore, identifying biomarkers of response to ICI is crucial to guide treatment decisions. The most evaluated biomarkers to date are programmed death ligand 1 expression, microsatellite instability/defective mismatch repair phenotype, and tumor mutational burden. Other emerging biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA and microbiota, require evaluation in clinical trials. This review aims to examine these biomarkers for ICI response in urothelial cancer and assess their analytical and clinical validation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
PMCID: PMC10486227
ISSN:1758-8359
1758-8340
1758-8359
DOI:10.1177/17588359231192402