Development and Evaluation of a Short Adverse Childhood Experiences Measure

• Published in: American journal of preventive medicine Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 163 - 172
• Main Authors: Wade, Roy, MD, PhD, MPH, Becker, Brandon D., MPH, Bevans, Katherine B., PhD, Ford, Derek C., PhD, Forrest, Christopher B., MD, PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01-02-2017; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Adult; Adults; Adverse childhood experiences; Adversity; Aged; Alcohol abuse; Alcoholism - diagnosis; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; Child; Child abuse & neglect; Child Abuse - diagnosis; Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data; Childhood experiences; Childhood factors; Clinical outcomes; Emotional abuse; Feasibility; Feasibility Studies; Female; Health status; Humans; Internal Medicine; Life Change Events; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Primary care; Primary Health Care - methods; Risk behavior; Risk Factors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Statistical analysis; Stress; Surveillance; Surveillance systems; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0749-3797; 1873-2607
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.033

Introduction Clinicians require tools to rapidly identify individuals with significant childhood adversity as part of routine primary care. The goal of this study was to shorten the 11-item Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) measure and evaluate the feasibility and validity of this shortened measure as a screener to identify adults who have experienced significant childhood adversity. Methods Statistical analysis was conducted in 2015. ACE item responses obtained from 2011–2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data were combined to form a sample of 71,413 adults aged ≥18 years. The 11-item Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System ACE measure was subsequently reduced to a two-item screener by maintaining the two dimensions of abuse and household stressors and selecting the most prevalent item within each dimension. Results The screener included household alcohol and childhood emotional abuse items. Overall, 42% of respondents and at least 75% of the individuals with four or more ACEs endorsed one or both of these experiences. Using the 11-item ACE measure as the standard, a cut off of one or more ACEs yielded a sensitivity of 99%, but specificity was low (66%). Specificity improved to 94% when using a cut off of two ACEs, but sensitivity diminished (70%). There was no substantive difference between the 11-and two-item ACE measures in their strength of association with an array of health outcomes. Conclusions A two-item ACE screener appropriate for rapid identification of adults who have experienced significant childhood adversity was developed.