Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study

• Published in: Pilot and feasibility studies Vol. 9; no. 1; p. 83
• Main Authors: Weaver, R G, Armstrong, B, Adams, E, Beets, M W, White, J, Flory, K, Wilson, D, McLain, A, Tennie, B
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 15-05-2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Behavior; Body mass index; Camps; Children; Children & youth; Families & family life; Food service; Girls clubs; Goal setting; Households; Intervention; Laws, regulations and rules; Low income groups; Obesity; Overweight; Parents & parenting; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Sleep; United States > US; Intervention; Obesity; Children; Overweight
• ISSN: 2055-5784; 2055-5784
• DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01312-3

This study assessed the initial feasibility and preliminary efficacy of providing children a free summer day camp and a parent intervention to improve self-regulation and mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain.
This pilot 2x2 factorial randomized control trial used a mixed-methods design to evaluate providing children a free summer day camp (SCV), a parent intervention (PI), and the combination of these two strategies (SCV+PI) to mitigate accelerated summer body mass index (BMI) gain. Progression criteria for feasibility and efficacy were assessed to determine if a full-scale trial was warranted. Feasibility criteria included recruitment capability (≥80 participants recruited) retention (≥70% participants retained), compliance (≥80% of participants attending the summer program with children attending ≥60% of program days, and ≥80% of participants completing goal setting calls with ≥60% of weeks syncing their child's Fitbit), and treatment fidelity (≥80% of summer program days delivered for ≥9 h/day, and ≥80% of participant texts delivered). Efficacy criteria were assessed via achieving a clinically meaningful impact on zBMI (i.e., ≥0.15). Changes in BMI were estimated using intent-to-treat and post hoc dose-response analyses via multilevel mixed-effects regressions.
For recruitment, capability and retention progression criteria were met with a total of 89 families participating and 24 participants randomized to the PI group, 21 randomized to the SCV group, 23 randomized to the SCV+PI group, and 21 randomized to the control. However, fidelity and compliance progression criteria were not achieved due to COVID-19 and lack of transportation. Progression criteria for efficacy was also not achieved as intent-to-treat analyses did not show changes in BMI gain that were clinically meaningful. Post hoc dose-response analyses showed that for each day (0 to 29) of summer programming children attended they gained -0.009 (95CI= -0.018, -0.001) less in BMI z score.
Engagement in both the SCV and PI was not ideal due to COVID-19 and lack of transportation. Providing children with structured summer programming to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain may be an effective strategy. However, because feasibility and efficacy progression criteria were not met, a larger trial is not warranted until further pilot work is completed to ensure children attend the programming.
The trial reported herein was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial #: NCT04608188.