Predicting United States Medical Licensure Examination Step 2 clinical knowledge scores from previous academic indicators

• Published in: Advances in medical education and practice Vol. 8; pp. 385 - 391
• Main Authors: Monteiro, Kristina A, George, Paul, Dollase, Richard, Dumenco, Luba
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01-01-2017; Taylor & Francis Ltd; Dove Medical Press
• Subjects: assessment; At risk students; Curricula; Educational research; Enrollments; Licenses; Licensing examinations; licensure exam; Medical education; Medical schools; Original Research; Professional examinations; Science; Step 2 CK; Studies; Tutoring; USMLE; Validity; United States; Washington DC; United States > US; assessment; medical education; Step 2 CK; USMLE; at-risk students; licensure exam
• ISSN: 1179-7258; 1179-7258
• DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S138557

The use of multiple academic indicators to identify students at risk of experiencing difficulty completing licensure requirements provides an opportunity to increase support services prior to high-stakes licensure examinations, including the United States Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE) Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK). Step 2 CK is becoming increasingly important in decision-making by residency directors because of increasing undergraduate medical enrollment and limited available residency vacancies. We created and validated a regression equation to predict students' Step 2 CK scores from previous academic indicators to identify students at risk, with sufficient time to intervene with additional support services as necessary. Data from three cohorts of students (N=218) with preclinical mean course exam score, National Board of Medical Examination subject examinations, and USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK between 2011 and 2013 were used in analyses. The authors created models capable of predicting Step 2 CK scores from academic indicators to identify at-risk students. In model 1, preclinical mean course exam score and Step 1 score accounted for 56% of the variance in Step 2 CK score. The second series of models included mean preclinical course exam score, Step 1 score, and scores on three NBME subject exams, and accounted for 67%-69% of the variance in Step 2 CK score. The authors validated the findings on the most recent cohort of graduating students (N=89) and predicted Step 2 CK score within a mean of four points (SD=8). The authors suggest using the first model as a needs assessment to gauge the level of future support required after completion of preclinical course requirements, and rescreening after three of six clerkships to identify students who might benefit from additional support before taking USMLE Step 2 CK.