Maintenance treatment for opioid dependence with slow-release oral morphine: a randomized cross-over, non-inferiority study versus methadone

Aims To compare the efficacy of slow‐release oral morphine (SROM) and methadone as maintenance medication for opioid dependence in patients previously treated with methadone. Design Prospective, multiple‐dose, open label, randomized, non‐inferiority, cross‐over study over two 11‐week periods. Methad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Addiction (Abingdon, England) Vol. 109; no. 4; pp. 617 - 626
Main Authors: Beck, Thilo, Haasen, Christian, Verthein, Uwe, Walcher, Stephan, Schuler, Christoph, Backmund, Markus, Ruckes, Christian, Reimer, Jens
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-04-2014
Blackwell
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims To compare the efficacy of slow‐release oral morphine (SROM) and methadone as maintenance medication for opioid dependence in patients previously treated with methadone. Design Prospective, multiple‐dose, open label, randomized, non‐inferiority, cross‐over study over two 11‐week periods. Methadone treatment was switched to SROM with flexible dosing and vice versa according to period and sequence of treatment. Setting Fourteen out‐patient addiction treatment centres in Switzerland and Germany. Participants Adults with opioid dependence in methadone maintenance programmes (dose ≥50 mg/day) for ≥26 weeks. Measurements The efficacy end‐point was the proportion of heroin‐positive urine samples per patient and period of treatment. Each week, two urine samples were collected, randomly selected and analysed for 6‐monoacetyl‐morphine and 6‐acetylcodeine. Non‐inferiority was concluded if the two‐sided 95% confidence interval (CI) in the difference of proportions of positive urine samples was below the predefined boundary of 10%. Findings One hundred and fifty‐seven patients fulfilled criteria to form the per protocol population. The proportion of heroin‐positive urine samples under SROM treatment (0.20) was non‐inferior to the proportion under methadone treatment (0.15) (least‐squares mean difference 0.05; 95% CI = 0.02, 0.08; P > 0.01). The 95% CI fell within the 10% non‐inferiority margin, confirming the non‐inferiority of SROM to methadone. A dose‐dependent effect was shown for SROM (i.e. decreasing proportions of heroin‐positive urine samples with increasing SROM doses). Retention in treatment showed no significant differences between treatments (period 1/period 2: SROM: 88.7%/82.1%, methadone: 91.1%/88.0%; period 1: P = 0.50, period 2: P = 0.19). Overall, safety outcomes were similar between the two groups. Conclusions Slow‐release oral morphine appears to be at least as effective as methadone in treating people with opioid use disorder.
Bibliography:Mundipharma Medical Company, Basel
ark:/67375/WNG-K8JJ1CTQ-C
istex:5FB7A3657329BFF01E627CDD2E3B433D6955F19E
ArticleID:ADD12440
Mundipharma Gesellschaft m.b.H. Sabine Gaa and Ulrich Ganzinger
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0965-2140
1360-0443
DOI:10.1111/add.12440