Much Ado About Nothing? A Real-World Study of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Switching Basal Insulin Analogs

Introduction Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive disease, and many patients eventually require insulin therapy. This study examined real-world outcomes of switching basal insulin analogs among patients with T2DM. Methods Using two large United States administrative claims databases (IMP...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in therapy Vol. 31; no. 5; pp. 539 - 560
Main Authors: Wei, Wenhui, Zhou, Steve, Miao, Raymond, Pan, Chunshen, Xie, Lin, Baser, Onur, Gill, Jasvinder
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg Springer Healthcare 01-05-2014
Springer
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive disease, and many patients eventually require insulin therapy. This study examined real-world outcomes of switching basal insulin analogs among patients with T2DM. Methods Using two large United States administrative claims databases (IMPACT ® and Humana ® ), this longitudinal retrospective study examined two cohorts of adult patients with T2DM. Previously on insulin glargine, Cohort 1 either continued insulin glargine (GLA-C) or switched to insulin detemir (DET-S), while Cohort 2 was previously on insulin detemir, and either continued insulin detemir (DET-C) or switched to insulin glargine (GLA-S). One-year follow-up treatment persistence and adherence, glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ), hypoglycemia events, healthcare utilization and costs were assessed. Selection bias was minimized by propensity score matching between treatment groups within each cohort. Results A total of 5,921 patients (mean age 60 years, female 50.0%, HbA 1c 8.6%) were included in the analysis (Cohort 1: IMPACT ® : n  = 536 DET-S matched to n  = 2,668 GLA-C; Humana ® : n  = 256 DET-S matched to n  = 1,262 GLA-C; Cohort 2: n  = 419 GLA-S matched to n  = 780 DET-C), with similar baseline characteristics between treatment groups in each cohort. During 1-year follow-up, in Cohort 1, DET-S patients, when compared with GLA-C patients, had lower treatment persistence/adherence with 33–40% restarting insulin glargine, higher rapid-acting insulin use, worse HbA 1c outcomes, significantly higher diabetes drug costs, and similar hypoglycemia rates, health care utilization and total costs. However, in Cohort 2 overall opposite outcomes were observed and only 19.8% GLA-S patients restarted insulin detemir. Conclusions This study showed contrasting clinical and economic outcomes when patients with T2DM switched basal insulin analogs, with worse outcomes observed for patients switching from insulin glargine to insulin detemir and improved outcomes when switching from insulin detemir to insulin glargine. Further investigation into the therapeutic interchangeability of insulin glargine and insulin detemir in the real-world setting is needed.
ISSN:0741-238X
1865-8652
DOI:10.1007/s12325-014-0120-1