Artificial Intelligence is Irreversibly Bound to Academic Publishing - ChatGPT is Cleared for Scientific Writing and Peer Review

• Published in: Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular Vol. 38; no. 4; p. e20230963
• Main Authors: Gomes, Walter J, Evora, Paulo R B, Guizilini, Solange
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 01-01-2023
• Subjects: Artificial Intelligence; Bias; CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS; Cardiology; Chatbots; Heart surgery; Humans; Language; Peer Review; Researchers; Scholarly publishing; SURGERY; Writing
• ISSN: 1678-9741; 0102-7638; 1678-9741
• DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0963

Bias is another concern since AI makes decisions solely on the data it receives as input; this data must represent accurate information. [...]while qualifying researchers and writers for scientific writing using AI can be an innovative and effective approach, it is important to ensure that they have a solid understanding of the principles and conventions of scientific writing. The announcement by the ICMJE signals an upheaval in recognizing the potential of AI language models in scientific manuscript writing, provided they are used wisely and in a way that complements human knowledge and skill, considerably advancing scientific understanding. * Correspondence Address: Walter J. Gomes https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3385-0215 E-mail: [e-mail] Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles.