GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices – evidence from three national health services

We present results from an extensive discrete choice experiment, which was conducted in three countries (Norway, Scotland, and England) with the aim of disclosing stated prescription behaviour in different decision making contexts and across different cost containment cultures. We show that GPs in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of health economics Vol. 49; pp. 169 - 183
Main Authors: Riise, Julie, Hole, Arne Risa, Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte, Skåtun, Diane
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01-09-2016
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We present results from an extensive discrete choice experiment, which was conducted in three countries (Norway, Scotland, and England) with the aim of disclosing stated prescription behaviour in different decision making contexts and across different cost containment cultures. We show that GPs in all countries respond to information about societal costs, benefits and effectiveness, and that they make trade-offs between them. The UK GPs have higher willingness to accept costs when they can prescribe medicines that are cheaper or more preferred by the patient, while Norwegian GPs tend to have higher willingness to accept costs for attributes regarding effectiveness or the doctors' experience. In general, there is a substantial amount of heterogeneity also within each country. We discuss the results from the DCE in the light of the GPs' two conflicting agency roles and what we know about the incentive structures and cultures in the different countries.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-6296
1879-1646
DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.07.001