Geospatial disparities and predictors of anaemia among pregnant women in Sub-Saharan Africa

• Published in: BMC pregnancy and childbirth Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 743
• Main Authors: Nyarko, Samuel H., Boateng, Ebenezer N.K, Dickson, Kwamena S., Adzrago, David, Addo, Isaac Y., Acquah, Evelyn, Ayebeng, Castro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 20-10-2023; BMC
• Subjects: Anaemia; Anemia; Geospatial; Health insurance; Hematology; Hemoglobin; Households; Iron; Literacy; Marital status; Maternal & child health; Pregnancy; Pregnant women; Rural areas; Socioeconomic factors; Statistical analysis; Sub-Saharan Africa; Urban areas; Variables; Womens health; Ethiopia; Sub-Saharan Africa
• ISSN: 1471-2393; 1471-2393
• DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06008-3

BackgroundAnaemia has become a major public health concern among women in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, little is known about the spatial disparities in anaemia prevalence and their associated factors among pregnant women in the region. This study analysed the spatial disparities in anaemia and their associated factors among pregnant women in rural and urban settings in SSA.MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of the most recent demographic and health surveys of 26 countries in SSA. Spatial autocorrelation and hotspot assessment were conducted, while a multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify demographic factors associated with anaemia.ResultsAnaemia was reported among ~50% of pregnant women in urban and rural areas of SSA. The hotspot analysis identified the West African sub-region as having a higher concentration of anaemia cases in rural settings. In urban areas, the odds of anaemia were significantly higher among pregnant women in their second trimester (Adjusted OR = 2.39, CI = 1.99, 2.76). On the other hand, pregnant women in their third trimester (Adjusted OR = 1.98, CI = 1.77, 2.22) and those who had taken intestinal parasite drugs (Adjusted OR = 1.12 CI = 1.02, 1.23) had a higher likelihood of having anaemia in rural areas. Pregnant women aged 35–39 years (Adjusted OR = 0.52, CI = 0.33, 0.81) and those aged 40–44 years (Adjusted OR = 0.69, CI = 0.50, 0.95) had a lesser likelihood of having anaemia compared to women aged 15–19 years in urban and rural areas respectively. Compared to Congo DR, Benin (OR = 2.22, CI = 1.51, 3.28) and Mali (OR = 3.71, CI = 2.73, 5.05) had higher odds of anaemia in urban and rural areas respectively.ConclusionsSpatial disparities in anaemia persist among pregnant women in rural and urban settings in SSA. Prevailing spatial variations in anaemia may be addressed by specialised interventions considering the contextual residential settings and socio-economic factors highlighted in this study.