Mechanical and functional validation of a perfused, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy simulation platform using a combination of 3D printing and hydrogel casting

Introduction and objectives There is a scarcity of high-fidelity, life-like, standardized and anatomically correct polymer-based kidney models for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) simulation training. The purpose of this technical report is to present mechanical and functional testing data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of urology Vol. 38; no. 7; pp. 1631 - 1641
Main Authors: Melnyk, Rachel, Ezzat, Bahie, Belfast, Elizabeth, Saba, Patrick, Farooq, Shamroz, Campbell, Timothy, McAleavey, Stephen, Buckley, Mark, Ghazi, Ahmed
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-07-2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction and objectives There is a scarcity of high-fidelity, life-like, standardized and anatomically correct polymer-based kidney models for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) simulation training. The purpose of this technical report is to present mechanical and functional testing data as evidence for utilizing a perfused hydrogel kidney model created utilizing 3D printed injection casts for RAPN simulation and training. Methods Anatomically correct, tumor-laden kidney models were created from 3D-printed casts designed from a patient's CT scan and injected with poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA). A variety of testing methods quantified Young’s modulus in addition to comparing the functional effects of bleeding and suturing among fresh porcine kidneys and various formulations of PVA kidneys. Results 7% PVA at three freeze–thaw cycles (7%-3FT) was found to be the formula that best replicates the mechanical properties of fresh porcine kidney tissue, where mean(± SD) values of Young’s modulus of porcine tissue vs 7%-3FT samples were calculated to be 85.97(± 35) kPa vs 80.97(± 9.05) kPa, 15.7(± 1.6) kPa vs 74.56(± 10) kPa and 87.46(± 2.97) kPa vs 83.4(± 0.7) kPa for unconfined compression, indentation and elastography testing, respectively. No significant difference was seen in mean suture tension during renorrhaphy necessary to achieve observable hemostasis and capsular violation during a simulated perfusion at 120 mmHg. Conclusions This is the first study to utilize extensive material testing analyses to determine the mechanical and functional properties of a perfused, inanimate simulation platform for RAPN, fabricated using a combination of image segmentation, 3D printing and PVA casting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Technical Report-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
Ahmed Ghazi: Associate Professor of Urology, Director of Simulation Innovation Laboratory, Department of Urology
Patrick Saba: Simulation Technologies researcher, Simulation Innovation Laboratory, Department of Urology
Author’s Contribution
Bahie Ezzat: Undergraduate Department of Biomedical Engineering, Intern at Simulation Innovation Laboratory
Rachel Melnyk: Engineer of Simulation Technologies MS, Simulation Innovation Laboratory, Department of Urology
Timothy Campbell: Medical Student
Stephen McAleavey: Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering; Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rochester Center for Biomedical Ultrasound
Manuscript writing/editing: R Melnyk, A Ghazi, T Campbell.
Shamroz Farooq: Medical Student
Data collection or management: B Ezzat, E Belfast, P Saba, S Farooq, R Melnyk, A Ghazi.
Elizabeth Belfast: Undergraduate Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Intern at Simulation Innovation Laboratory
Protocol/project development: R Melnyk, S McAleavey, M Buckley, A Ghazi.
Mark Buckley: Assistant Professor - Department of Biomedical Engineering (RC), Center for Visual Science A&S (RC) – Joint.
Data analysis: B Ezzat, E Belfast, P Saba, S Farooq, R Melnyk, A Ghazi.
ISSN:0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02989-z