Analysis of contact pressure in a 3D model of dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 3564
• Main Authors: Tauviqirrahman, Mohammad, Ammarullah, Muhammad Imam, Jamari, J., Saputra, Eko, Winarni, Tri Indah, Kurniawan, Febri Dwi, Shiddiq, Shidnan Amir, van der Heide, Emile
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 02-03-2023; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/61/54; 639/166; 639/301; 639/705; Acetabulum; Acetabulum - surgery; Computer Simulation; Femur; Femur Head; Finite element method; Gait; Hip; Hip joint; Hip Prosthesis; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Mathematical models; Mobility; Molecular weight; multidisciplinary; Pressure; Prostheses; Prosthetics; Risk reduction; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Stainless steel; Variation
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30725-6

Hip joint prostheses are used to replace hip joint function in the human body. The latest dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis has an additional component of an outer liner that acts as a cover for the liner component. Research on the contact pressure generated on the latest model of a dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle has never been done before. The model is made of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) on the inner liner and 316L stainless steel (SS 316L) on the outer liner and acetabular cup. Simulation modeling using the finite element method is considered static loading with an implicit solver for studying the geometric parameter design of dual-mobility hip joint prostheses. In this study, simulation modeling was carried out by applying varying inclination angles of 30°, 40°, 45°, 50°, 60°, and 70° to the acetabular cup component. Three-dimensional loads were placed on femoral head reference points with variations of femoral head diameter used at 22 mm, 28 mm, and 32 mm. The results in the inner surface of the inner liner, the outer surface of the outer liner, and the inner surface of the acetabular cup showed that the variations in inclination angle do not have a major effect on the maximum contact pressure value on the liner component, where the acetabular cup with an inclination angle of 45° can reduce contact pressure more than the other studied inclination angle variations. In addition, it was found that the 22 mm diameter of the femoral head increases the contact pressure. The use of a larger diameter femoral head with an acetabular cup configuration at a 45° inclination can minimize the risk of implant failure due to wear.