Retaining interest in caring for underserved patients among future medicine subspecialists: Underserved Medicine and Public Health (UMPH) program

• Published in: BMC medical education Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 589
• Main Authors: Catalanotti, Jillian S, Popiel, David K, Barbour, April
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 20-11-2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Behavior Change; Behavior Modification; Careers; Caring; Community health; Community health services; Community Relations; Electronic mail systems; Federal Programs; Graduate medical education; Graduates; Health care access; Health disparities; Health facilities; Health insurance; Health Programs; Internal medicine; Literature Reviews; Medicaid; Medical education; Medical Services; Medicine; Patients; Physicians; Primary care; Program Evaluation; Public health; Seminars; Study and teaching; Underserved medicine; Uninsured people; Urban Schools; Urban Universities; United States; United States > US; California
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-03006-x

Abstract
Background
Accessing subspecialty care is hard for underserved patients in the U.S. Published curricula in underserved medicine for Internal Medicine residents target future-primary care physicians, with unknown impact on future medicine subspecialists.
Methods
The aim was to retain interest in caring for underserved patients among Internal Medicine residents who plan for subspecialist careers at an urban university hospital. The two-year Underserved Medicine and Public Health (UMPH) program features community-based clinics, evening seminars, reflection assignments and practicum projects for 3–7 Internal Medicine residents per year. All may apply regardless of anticipated career plans after residency. Seven years of graduates were surveyed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results
According to respondents, UMPH provided a meaningful forum to discuss important issues in underserved medicine, fostered interest in treating underserved populations and provided a sense of belonging to a community of providers committed to underserved medicine. After residency, 48% of UMPH graduates pursued subspecialty training and 34% practiced hospitalist medicine. 65% of respondents disagreed that “UMPH made me more likely to practice primary care” and 59% agreed “UMPH should target residents pursuing subpecialty careers.”
Conclusions
A curriculum in underserved medicine can retain interest in caring for underserved patients among future-medicine subspecialists. Lessons learned include [1] building relationships with local community health centers and community-practicing physicians was important for success and [2] thoughtful scheduling promoted high resident attendance at program events and avoided detracting from other activities required during residency for subspecialist career paths. We hope Internal Medicine residency programs consider training in underserved medicine for all trainees. Future work should investigate sustainability, whether training results in improved subspecialty access, and whether subspecialists face unique barriers caring for underserved patients. Future curricula should include advocacy skills to target systemic barriers.