Patterns of Care in Elderly Head-and-Neck Cancer Radiation Oncology Patients: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Purpose To compare the patterns of care for elderly head-and-neck cancer patients with those of younger patients. Methods and Materials A retrospective review was conducted of all new mucosal head-and-neck cancer referrals to radiation oncology between July 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007 at our insti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 79; no. 1; pp. 46 - 51
Main Authors: Huang, Shao Hui, M.Sc., R.T. (T.), O'Sullivan, Brian, M.D, Waldron, John, M.D, Lockwood, Gina, M.Math, Bayley, Andrew, M.D, Kim, John, M.D, Cummings, Bernard, M.B, Dawson, Laura A., M.D, Hope, Andrew, M.D, Cho, John, M.D, Witterick, Ian, M.D, Chen, Eric X., M.D, Ringash, Jolie, M.D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 2011
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To compare the patterns of care for elderly head-and-neck cancer patients with those of younger patients. Methods and Materials A retrospective review was conducted of all new mucosal head-and-neck cancer referrals to radiation oncology between July 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007 at our institution. The clinical characteristics, treatment pattern, tolerance, and outcomes were compared between the elderly (aged ≥75 years) and younger (aged <75 years) cohorts. Results A total of 2,312 patients, including 452 (20%) elderly and 1,860 (80%) younger patients, were studied. The elderly patients were more likely to be women (36% vs. 27%, p <.01) and to have other malignancies (23% vs. 13%, p <.01), Stage I or II disease (38% vs. 32%, p <.01), and N0 status (56% vs. 42%, p <.01). Treatment was less often curative in intent (79% vs. 93%, p <.01). For the 1,487 patients who received definitive radiotherapy (RT), no differences were found between the elderly ( n = 238) and younger ( n = 1,249) patients in treatment interruption, completion, or treatment-related death. Within the subset of 760 patients who received intensified treatment (concurrent chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated accelerated RT), no difference was seen between the elderly ( n = 46) and younger ( n = 714) patients in treatment interruption, completion, or treatment-related death. After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the 2-year cause-specific survival rate after definitive RT was 72% (range, 65–78%) for the elderly vs. 86% (range, 84–88%) for the younger patients ( p <.01). Conclusion Elderly head-and-neck cancer patients exhibited different clinical characteristics and experienced different patterns of care from younger patients. Although age itself was an adverse predictor of cause-specific survival, its effect was modest. Elderly patients selected for definitive RT or intensified RT showed no evidence of impaired treatment tolerance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.052