Age of gray matters: Neuroprediction of recidivism

Age is one of the best predictors of antisocial behavior. Risk models of recidivism often combine chronological age with demographic, social and psychological features to aid in judicial decision-making. Here we use independent component analyses (ICA) and machine learning techniques to demonstrate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeuroImage clinical Vol. 19; pp. 813 - 823
Main Authors: Kiehl, Kent A., Anderson, Nathaniel E., Aharoni, Eyal, Maurer, J.Michael, Harenski, Keith A., Rao, Vikram, Claus, Eric D., Harenski, Carla, Koenigs, Mike, Decety, Jean, Kosson, David, Wager, Tor D., Calhoun, Vince D., Steele, Vaughn R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01-01-2018
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Age is one of the best predictors of antisocial behavior. Risk models of recidivism often combine chronological age with demographic, social and psychological features to aid in judicial decision-making. Here we use independent component analyses (ICA) and machine learning techniques to demonstrate the utility of using brain-based measures of cerebral aging to predict recidivism. First, we developed a brain-age model that predicts chronological age based on structural MRI data from incarcerated males (n = 1332). We then test the model's ability to predict recidivism in a new sample of offenders with longitudinal outcome data (n = 93). Consistent with hypotheses, inclusion of brain-age measures of the inferior frontal cortex and anterior-medial temporal lobes (i.e., amygdala) improved prediction models when compared with models using chronological age; and models that combined psychological, behavioral, and neuroimaging measures provided the most robust prediction of recidivism. These results verify the utility of brain measures in predicting future behavior, and suggest that brain-based data may more precisely account for important variation when compared with traditional proxy measures such as chronological age. This work also identifies new brain systems that contribute to recidivism which has clinical implications for treatment development. •A brain-age model is developed on a large sample of MRI data collected from incarcerated males (n = 1332).•The model is tested in a new sample to predict recidivism using brain vs. chronological age.•Brain-age measures outperformed chronological age in prediction of recidivism.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2213-1582
2213-1582
DOI:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.036