How COVID‐19 vaccine supply chains emerged in the midst of a pandemic
Many months after COVID‐19 vaccines were first authorised for public use, still limited supplies could only partially reduce the devastating loss of life and economic costs caused by the pandemic. Could additional vaccine doses have been manufactured more quickly some other way? Would alternative po...
Saved in:
Published in: | World economy Vol. 45; no. 2; pp. 468 - 522 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-02-2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Many months after COVID‐19 vaccines were first authorised for public use, still limited supplies could only partially reduce the devastating loss of life and economic costs caused by the pandemic. Could additional vaccine doses have been manufactured more quickly some other way? Would alternative policy choices have made a difference? This paper provides a simple analytical framework through which to view the contours of the vaccine value chain. It then creates a new database that maps the COVID‐19 vaccines of Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca/Oxford, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax and CureVac to the product‐ and location‐specific manufacturing supply chains that emerged in 2020 and 2021. It describes the choppy process through which dozens of other companies at nearly 100 geographically distributed facilities came together to scale up global manufacturing. The paper catalogues major pandemic policy initiatives – such as the United States' Operation Warp Speed – that are likely to have affected the timing and formation of those vaccine supply chains. Given the data, a final section identifies further questions for researchers and policymakers. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information After this paper was written but before it was published, Bollyky became a senior consultant for the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). For helpful comments and suggestions, the authors thank Chris Adams, David Greenaway (the editor), Anna Isaac, Soumaya Keynes, Jacob Kirkegaard, Sam Lowe, Jim Miller, Chris Rogers, Kadee Russ, Dave Vanness and Prashant Yadav. Hexuan Li and Yilin Wang provided outstanding research assistance. Melina Kolb, William Melancon and Oliver Ward assisted with graphics. Any errors are our own. None ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0378-5920 1467-9701 1467-9701 |
DOI: | 10.1111/twec.13183 |