How COVID‐19 vaccine supply chains emerged in the midst of a pandemic

Many months after COVID‐19 vaccines were first authorised for public use, still limited supplies could only partially reduce the devastating loss of life and economic costs caused by the pandemic. Could additional vaccine doses have been manufactured more quickly some other way? Would alternative po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World economy Vol. 45; no. 2; pp. 468 - 522
Main Authors: Bown, Chad P., Bollyky, Thomas J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-02-2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many months after COVID‐19 vaccines were first authorised for public use, still limited supplies could only partially reduce the devastating loss of life and economic costs caused by the pandemic. Could additional vaccine doses have been manufactured more quickly some other way? Would alternative policy choices have made a difference? This paper provides a simple analytical framework through which to view the contours of the vaccine value chain. It then creates a new database that maps the COVID‐19 vaccines of Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca/Oxford, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax and CureVac to the product‐ and location‐specific manufacturing supply chains that emerged in 2020 and 2021. It describes the choppy process through which dozens of other companies at nearly 100 geographically distributed facilities came together to scale up global manufacturing. The paper catalogues major pandemic policy initiatives – such as the United States' Operation Warp Speed – that are likely to have affected the timing and formation of those vaccine supply chains. Given the data, a final section identifies further questions for researchers and policymakers.
Bibliography:Funding information
After this paper was written but before it was published, Bollyky became a senior consultant for the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).
For helpful comments and suggestions, the authors thank Chris Adams, David Greenaway (the editor), Anna Isaac, Soumaya Keynes, Jacob Kirkegaard, Sam Lowe, Jim Miller, Chris Rogers, Kadee Russ, Dave Vanness and Prashant Yadav. Hexuan Li and Yilin Wang provided outstanding research assistance. Melina Kolb, William Melancon and Oliver Ward assisted with graphics. Any errors are our own.
None
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0378-5920
1467-9701
1467-9701
DOI:10.1111/twec.13183