The influence of sensitivity to reward on reactivity to alcohol-related cues
Aims. To investigate the role of sensitivity to reward in mediating social drinkers' reactivity to alcohol cues. Design. A standard cue‐reactivity paradigm was employed. Two groups of social drinkers (heavy and light) were assessed after exposure to the sight, smell and taste of a neutral cue...
Saved in:
Published in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) Vol. 96; no. 8; pp. 1175 - 1185 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Carfax Publishing, part of the Taylor & Francis Group
01-08-2001
Blackwell Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aims. To investigate the role of sensitivity to reward in mediating social drinkers' reactivity to alcohol cues.
Design. A standard cue‐reactivity paradigm was employed. Two groups of social drinkers (heavy and light) were assessed after exposure to the sight, smell and taste of a neutral cue (water) and then an alcohol cue (glass of beer).
Setting. Sessions were conducted in a laboratory based environment.
Participants. Twenty heavy (12 males, eight females) and 18 light social drinkers (seven males, 11 females) were recruited; mean age was 23.6 years.
Measurements. The Card Arranging Reward Responsivity Objective Test (CARROT), assessing behavioural reponsiveness to a monetary incentive; urge to drink; positive affect; and the BAS scales, assessing sensitivity to reward.
Findings. Heavy drinkers displayed a significant increase in responsivity to rewards (i.e. CARROT) and self‐reported urge to drink, but not positive affect, after exposure to alcohol. For the heavy drinkers, heightened sensitivity to reward (i.e. BAS scales) was significantly related to cue‐elicited urge to drink and positive affect.
Conclusion. The results are consistent with a conditioned appetitive motivational model of alcohol use and suggest that Gray's theory of personality may be of some benefit in explaining variation in reactivity responses. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-CDM15R99-D istex:8531C6276163F332E520F4008FDE5E46F2A68D28 ArticleID:ADD968117510 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.968117510.x |