Do Activity Levels Increase After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

• Published in: Clinical orthopaedics and related research Vol. 472; no. 5; pp. 1502 - 1511
• Main Authors: Harding, Paula, Holland, Anne E., Delany, Clare, Hinman, Rana S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston Springer US 01-05-2014; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
• Subjects: Actigraphy - instrumentation; Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects; Biomechanical Phenomena; Clinical Research; Conservative Orthopedics; Equipment Design; Female; Health Status; Hip Joint - physiopathology; Hip Joint - surgery; Humans; Knee Joint - physiopathology; Knee Joint - surgery; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Motor Activity; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnosis; Osteoarthritis, Hip - physiopathology; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis; Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; Pain, Postoperative - etiology; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Recovery of Function; Sedentary Lifestyle; Sports Medicine; Surgery; Surgical Orthopedics; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Uniaxial Accelerometer; Physical Activity; Activity Monitor; Physical Activity Monitor; Physical Activity Guideline
• ISSN: 0009-921X; 1528-1132
• DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3427-3

Background
People with osteoarthritis (OA) often are physically inactive. Surgical treatment including total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty can substantially improve pain, physical function, and quality of life. However, their impact on physical activity levels is less clear.
Questions/purposes
We used accelerometers to measure levels of physical activity pre- and (6 months) postarthroplasty and to examine the proportion of people meeting the American Physical Activity Guidelines.
Methods
Sixty-three people with hip or knee OA awaiting arthroplasty were recruited from a major metropolitan hospital. Physical activity was measured using accelerometry before, and 6 months after, surgery. The ActiGraph GT1M (ActiGraph LLC, Fort Walton Beach, FL, USA) was used in this study and is a uniaxial accelerometer contained within a small activity monitor designed to measure human movement through changes in acceleration, which can then be used to estimate physical activity over time. Questionnaires were used to assess patient-reported changes in pain, function, quality of life, and physical activity. Complete data sets (including valid physical activity data) for both time points were obtained for 44 participants (70%). At baseline before arthroplasty, the activity level of patients was, on average, sedentary for 82% of the time over a 24-hour period (based on accelerometry) and self-rated as “sometimes participates in mild activities such as walking, limited shopping, and housework” according to the UCLA activity scale.
Results
There was no change in objectively measured physical activity after arthroplasty. The majority of participants were sedentary, both before and after arthroplasty, and did not meet the American Physical Activity Guidelines recommended to promote health. This was despite significant improvements in self-reported measures of pain, function, quality of life, and physical activity after arthroplasty.
Conclusions
Despite patient-reported improvements in pain, function, and physical activity after arthroplasty, objectively measured improvements in physical activity may not occur. Clinicians should incorporate strategies for improving physical activity into their management of patients after hip and knee arthroplasty to maximize health status. Future research is needed to explore the factors that impact physical activity levels in people after arthroplasty.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.