Ursolic, oleanolic and betulinic acids: Antibacterial spectra and selectivity indexes

Ursolic acid (UA), oleanolic acid (OA) and betulinic acid (BA), three hydroxyl pentacyclic triterpenoic acids (HPTAs) naturally found in a large variety of vegetarian foods, medicinal herbs and plants have been investigated for antibacterial activity. To determine the antibacterial activity of UA, O...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of ethnopharmacology Vol. 120; no. 2; pp. 272 - 276
Main Authors: Fontanay, Stéphane, Grare, Marion, Mayer, Joséphine, Finance, Chantal, Duval, Raphaël Emmanuel
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 20-11-2008
Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Ursolic acid (UA), oleanolic acid (OA) and betulinic acid (BA), three hydroxyl pentacyclic triterpenoic acids (HPTAs) naturally found in a large variety of vegetarian foods, medicinal herbs and plants have been investigated for antibacterial activity. To determine the antibacterial activity of UA, OA and BA, as well as the toxic impact on eukaryotic cells. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined against five reference strains ( Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 & ATCC 29213, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853), as well as five antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates. Toxicity was evaluated against MRC-5 and HaCaT cell lines. No antibacterial activity was observed for BA; while OA and more particularly UA, did show a moderate to good antibacterial activity, but limited to Gram-positive bacteria. Nevertheless, OA and UA were devoid of antibacterial activities against clinical isolates. Moreover, viability and cytotoxic assays demonstrated that the three compounds induced a significant cytotoxicity. Despite of a relative similar chemical structure; UA, OA and BA harboured different antibacterial activities, with more significant ones for UA. However, considering both viability and toxicity values, these compounds seem to have a significant impact on eukaryotic cell viability.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2008.09.001
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0378-8741
1872-7573
DOI:10.1016/j.jep.2008.09.001