The Prevalence of DSM-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review

• Published in: Neurotherapeutics Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 490 - 499
• Main Author: Willcutt, Erik G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer-Verlag 01-07-2012; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Algorithms; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - epidemiology; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Databases, Factual - statistics & numerical data; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Humans; Neurobiology; Neurology; Neurosciences; Neurosurgery; Prevalence; Systematic review; ADHD; Subtypes; DSM-IV; Prevalence; Diagnosis
• ISSN: 1933-7213; 1878-7479; 1878-7479
• DOI: 10.1007/s13311-012-0135-8

This article describes a comprehensive meta-analysis that was conducted to estimate the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), as defined by the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition
(DSM-IV). A systematic literature review identified 86 studies of children and adolescents (N = 163,688 individuals) and 11 studies of adults (N = 14,112 individuals) that met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis, more than half of which were published after the only previous meta-analysis of the prevalence of ADHD was completed. Although prevalence estimates reported by individual studies varied widely, pooled results suggest that the prevalence of DSM-IV ADHD is similar, whether ADHD is defined by parent ratings, teacher ratings, or a best estimate diagnostic procedure in children and adolescents (5.9–7.1 %), or by self-report measures in young adults (5.0 %). Analyses of diagnostic subtypes indicated that the predominantly inattentive type is the most common subtype in the population, but individuals with the combined type are more likely to be referred for clinical services. Additional research is needed to determine the etiology of the higher prevalence of ADHD in males than females and to clarify whether the prevalence of ADHD varies as a function of socioeconomic status or ethnicity. Finally, there were no significant prevalent differences between countries or regions of the world after controlling for differences in the diagnostic algorithms used to define ADHD. These results provide important support for the diagnostic validity of ADHD, and argue against the hypothesis that ADHD is a cultural construct that is restricted to the United States or any other specific culture.