Clofarabine with high dose cytarabine and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) priming for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukaemia

Summary This phase I/II study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and efficacy of clofarabine in combination with high dose cytarabine and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) priming (GCLAC), in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of haematology Vol. 155; no. 2; pp. 182 - 189
Main Authors: Becker, Pamela S., Kantarjian, Hagop M., Appelbaum, Frederick R., Petersdorf, Stephen H., Storer, Barry, Pierce, Sherry, Shan, Jianqin, Hendrie, Paul C., Pagel, John M., Shustov, Andrei R., Stirewalt, Derek L., Faderl, Stephan, Harrington, Elizabeth, Estey, Elihu H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-10-2011
Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary This phase I/II study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and efficacy of clofarabine in combination with high dose cytarabine and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) priming (GCLAC), in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Dose escalation of clofarabine occurred without dose‐limiting toxicity, so most patients were treated at the maximum dose, 25 mg/m2 per day with cytarabine 2 g/m2 per day, each for 5 d, and G‐CSF 5 μg/kg, beginning the day before chemotherapy and continuing daily until neutrophil recovery. The complete remission (CR) rate among the 46 evaluable patients was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31–61%) and the CR + CR but with a platelet count <100 × 109/l rate was 61% (95% CI 45–75%). Multivariate analysis showed that responses to GCLAC were independent of age, cytogenetic risk category, and number of prior salvage regimens. GCLAC is highly active in relapsed and refractory AML and warrants prospective comparison to other regimens, as well as study in untreated patients.
Bibliography:Presented in abstract form at the 50th annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, San Francisco, CA, 6–9 December 2008, at the 51st annual meeting in New Orleans, LA, 5–8 December 2009, and at the 52nd annual meeting in Orlando, FL, 4–7 December 2010.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1048
1365-2141
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08831.x