Carotid Tonometry Versus Synthesized Aorta Pressure Waves for the Estimation of Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index

To assess the interchangeability of carotid tonometry and synthesized aorta pressure waveforms for estimating central systolic blood pressure (SBP) and augmentation index (AIx). Tonometry waveforms were acquired with a custom built hardware and software platform in 276 subjects (179 men/97 women; ag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of hypertension Vol. 18; no. 9; pp. 1168 - 1173
Main Authors: Segers, Patrick, Rietzschel, Ernst, Heireman, Steven, De Buyzere, Marc, Gillebert, Thierry, Verdonck, Pascal, Van Bortel, Luc
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-09-2005
Oxford University Press
Elsevier Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To assess the interchangeability of carotid tonometry and synthesized aorta pressure waveforms for estimating central systolic blood pressure (SBP) and augmentation index (AIx). Tonometry waveforms were acquired with a custom built hardware and software platform in 276 subjects (179 men/97 women; aged 45.5 ± 5.7 years; mean ± standard deviation) at the radial (P wf,ra), brachial (P wf,ba), and carotid artery (P wf,ca). The P wf,ba was calibrated using systolic (SBP ba) and diastolic (DBP ba) sphygmomanometer pressure. The DBP ba and calculated mean (MAP ba) brachial pressure were subsequently used for calibration of P wf,ra and P wf,ca. A central pressure waveform (P wf,sao) was synthesized from P wf,ra using a generalized pressure transfer function (TFF). The AIx and SBP were measured on P wf,ra, P wf,ca, and P wf,sao. The SBP ra, SBP ca, and SBP sao were 138.5 ± 16.8, 130.0 ± 16.2, and 131.1 ± 16.6 mm Hg, respectively. The SBP ra correlated well with the SBP ca ( r = 0.93) and the SBP sao ( r = 0.94), as did the SBP ca and the SBP sao ( r = 0.97) with a mean bias of 1.35 ± 3.90 mm Hg. The AIx derived from P wf,ra, P wf,ca, and P wf,sao were −20.8% ± 14.5%, 12.4% ± 13.9%, and 20.0% ± 11.7%, respectively. The correlation between radial and carotid, and radial and central AIx was 0.72 and 0.94, respectively. The correlation between AIx derived from P wf,ca and P wf,sao was 0.75 with a bias of 11.0% ± 14% (all correlations P < .001). The use of a generalized TFF in combination with well-calibrated radial pressure curves yields estimates of SBP in good agreement with carotid tonometry. Although AIx derived from a measured radial pressure curve correlates surprisingly closely with AIx measured on a synthesized aortic pressure curve, the correlation with a directly measured AIx on carotid signals is relatively poor.
Bibliography:This research was funded by the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders, Belgium (FWO-Vlaanderen) research grants G.0192.03 and G.0427.03 (the Asklepios Study).
ark:/67375/HXZ-JT0SS4FZ-Z
istex:38E24691D6132C15D5B3040C6E593F834AA624F2
href:18_9_1168.pdf
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0895-7061
1879-1905
1941-7225
DOI:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.04.005