Proarrhythmic Safety of Repeat Doses of Mirabegron in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-, and Active-Controlled Thorough QT Study

Potential effects of the selective β3‐adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron on cardiac repolarization were studied in healthy subjects. The four‐arm, parallel, two‐way crossover study was double‐blind and placebo‐ and active (moxifloxacin)‐controlled. After 2 baseline ECG days, subjects were randomized to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Vol. 92; no. 6; pp. 696 - 706
Main Authors: Malik, M, van Gelderen, E M, Lee, J H, Kowalski, D L, Yen, M, Goldwater, R, Mujais, S K, Schaddelee, M P, de Koning, P, Kaibara, A, Moy, S S, Keirns, J J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Basingstoke Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-12-2012
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Potential effects of the selective β3‐adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron on cardiac repolarization were studied in healthy subjects. The four‐arm, parallel, two‐way crossover study was double‐blind and placebo‐ and active (moxifloxacin)‐controlled. After 2 baseline ECG days, subjects were randomized to one of eight treatment sequences (22 females and 22 males per sequence) of placebo crossed over with once‐daily (10 days) 50, 100, or 200 mg mirabegron or a single 400‐mg moxifloxacin dose on day 10. In each period, continuous ECGs were recorded at two baselines and on the last drug administration day. The lower one‐sided 95% confidence interval for moxifloxacin effect on QTcI was >5 ms, demonstrating assay sensitivity. According to ICH E14 criteria, mirabegron did not cause QTcI prolongation at the 50‐mg therapeutic and 100‐mg supratherapeutic doses in either sex. Mirabegron prolonged QTcI interval at the 200‐mg supratherapeutic dose (upper one‐sided 95% CI >10 ms) in females, but not in males. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2012); 92 6, 696–706. doi:10.1038/clpt.2012.181
Bibliography:istex:2EDB44C79D8C1BA358B97C3245DAE72099699398
ArticleID:CPTCLPT2012181
Supplementary Materials and Methods
ark:/67375/WNG-NDPZ25LR-9
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-9236
1532-6535
DOI:10.1038/clpt.2012.181