National outcomes of expedited discharge following esophagectomy for malignancy

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 19; no. 2; p. e0297470
• Main Authors: Ebrahimian, Shayan, Chervu, Nikhil, Hadaya, Joseph, Cho, Nam Yong, Kronen, Elsa, Sakowitz, Sara, Verma, Arjun, Bakhtiyar, Syed Shahyan, Sanaiha, Yas, Benharash, Peyman
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 23-02-2024; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Esophagus; Evaluation; Medical care; Morbidity; Quality management; Surgery; United States
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297470

Expedited discharge following esophagectomy is controversial due to concerns for higher readmissions and financial burden. The present study aimed to evaluate the association of expedited discharge with hospitalization costs and unplanned readmissions following esophagectomy for malignant lesions.
Adults undergoing elective esophagectomy for cancer were identified in the 2014-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients discharged by postoperative day 7 were considered Expedited and others as Routine. Patients who did not survive to discharge or had major perioperative complications were excluded. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess association of expedited discharge with index hospitalization costs as well as 30- and 90-day non-elective readmissions.
Of 9,886 patients who met study criteria, 34.6% comprised the Expedited cohort. After adjustment, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.71, p = 0.001) and increasing Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (AOR 0.88/point, p<0.001) were associated with lower odds of expedited discharge, while laparoscopic (AOR 1.63, p<0.001, Ref: open) and robotic (AOR 1.67, p = 0.003, Ref: open) approach were linked to greater likelihood. Patients at centers in the highest-tertile of minimally invasive esophagectomy volume had increased odds of expedited discharge (AOR 1.52, p = 0.025, Ref: lowest-tertile). On multivariable analysis, expedited discharge was independently associated with an $8,300 reduction in hospitalization costs. Notably, expedited discharge was associated with similar odds of 30-day (AOR 1.10, p = 0.40) and 90-day (AOR 0.90, p = 0.70) unplanned readmissions.
Expedited discharge after esophagectomy was associated with decreased costs and unaltered readmissions. Prospective studies are necessary to robustly evaluate whether expedited discharge is appropriate for select patients undergoing esophagectomy.