The development of a clinically useful tool for predicting the development of psychological disorder following injury
Objectives To identify factors significantly associated with post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression at 3 months post‐injury; to develop a generic model to predict the occurrence of PTSD, anxiety, and depression at 3 months post‐injury; and to validate this model in a test dat...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of clinical psychology Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 31 - 45 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-03-2009
British Psychological Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives
To identify factors significantly associated with post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression at 3 months post‐injury; to develop a generic model to predict the occurrence of PTSD, anxiety, and depression at 3 months post‐injury; and to validate this model in a test data set of patients.
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Methods
Participants were 823 patients attending an emergency department (ED) following accidental injury. Baseline questionnaires were completed, with 1 and 3 months postal follow‐ups. Predictor variables demonstrating significant associations with two of the three outcome measures (3‐month HAD anxiety and depression scores and PTSD symptoms) were included in multivariate regression models for each outcome. Non‐significant predictor variables were removed until all remaining independent variables made the most significant contribution to each of the three models. Models were validated using a test dataset.
Results
Previous history of mental health problems, neuroticism score and having PTSD symptoms at 1 month predicted adverse outcomes at 3 months. When used on the test datasets, the areas under the receiver operating curve (ROC) curve for the models predicting outcomes at 3 months were: PTSD=0.91 (sensitivity=88.5%); anxiety=0.87 (sensitivity=93.7%); and depression=0.87 (sensitivity=96.7%).
Conclusions
The final model performed moderately well across the three outcomes and may be useful clinically as a generic rule‐out tool to identify those who will not require follow up, watchful waiting or intervention. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:BJC455 istex:979DF6366243E7E9A6C345886A7CF5430292A98C ark:/67375/WNG-Z2ZMDZS7-L ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0144-6657 2044-8260 |
DOI: | 10.1348/014466508X344799 |