A Correlation Between Fractional Anisotropy Variations and Clinical Recovery in Spinal Cord Infarctions

ABSTRACT PURPOSE To describe diffusion‐weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging variations in spinal cord infarctions. METHODS We studied the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) local variations in 2 patients with spinal cord infarcts in the conus region at days...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuroimaging Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 256 - 258
Main Authors: Théaudin, Marie, Saliou, Guillaume, Denier, Christian, Adams, David, Ducreux, Denis
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01-04-2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT PURPOSE To describe diffusion‐weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging variations in spinal cord infarctions. METHODS We studied the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) local variations in 2 patients with spinal cord infarcts in the conus region at days 3–4, 9–10, and 15–22 after clinical onset, and correlated them with the clinical outcome. RESULTS Both patients (19 and 53 years‐old) presented spinal cord infarction unraveled by paraparesis and bladder dysfunction. Although initial clinical and radiological presentations were similar, the first patient early and fully recovered whereas the second kept severe bladder dysfunctions. Early absolute values of FA and ADC did not seem to correlate with outcome. At day 9–10, the second patient, who presented definitive sequel, had decreasing values of FA in the ischemic region whereas they had increased in the first patient, who fully recovered. CONCLUSION FA values could be an interesting prognosis marker in spinal cord ischemia, which needs to be confirmed by a larger study.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JON675
istex:6BF417ABEF4C9FA94AE09DCD3B7BC0487014113F
ark:/67375/WNG-V7W0LRJN-R
No grant to report.
J Neuroimaging 2013;23:256‐258.
ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1051-2284
1552-6569
DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00675.x