Dental implant surface temperatures following double wavelength (2780/940 nm) laser irradiation in vitro

• Published in: Clinical and experimental dental research Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. 512 - 521
• Main Authors: Fahlstedt, Peter, Bunæs, Dagmar F, Lie, Stein Atle, Leknes, Knut N
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-08-2021; John Wiley and Sons Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Biofilms; Body temperature; Calibration; Debridement; dental implant; Dental Implants; Energy; Humans; laser; Lasers; Lasers, Semiconductor; Lasers, Solid-State; Original; Photonics; Temperature; Titanium; Switzerland; Sweden; temperature; laser; calibration; titanium; dental implant
• ISSN: 2057-4347; 2057-4347
• DOI: 10.1002/cre2.369

Objective
To estimate the implant surface temperature at titanium dental implants during calibrated irradiation using double wavelength laser.
Material and methods
A double wavelength laser, 2780 nm Er,Cr:YSGG and 940 nm diode, was calibrated and used to irradiate pristine titanium dental implants, OsseoSpeed, TiUnite and Roxolid SLActive, representing different surface modifications. Initial calibration (21 implants; 7 implants/group) intended to identify optimal wavelength/specific output power/energy that not critically increased the temperature or altered the micro‐texture of the implant surface. Subsequent experimental study (30 implants; 10 implants/group) evaluated implant surface temperature changes over 190 s. Irradiation using a computerized robotic setup.
Results
Based on the initial calibration, the following output powers/energies were employed: Er,Cr:YSGG laser 18.4 mJ/pulse (7.3 J/cm2)–36.2 mJ/pulse (14.4 J/cm2) depending on implant surface; diode laser 3.3 W (1321.0 W/cm2). During double wavelength irradiation, implant surface temperatures dropped over the first 20 s from baseline 37°C to mean temperatures ranging between 25.7 and 26.3°C. Differences in mean temperatures between OsseoSpeed and TiUnite implants were statistically significant (p < 0.001). After the initial 20 s, mean temperatures continued to decrease for all implant surfaces. The decrease was significantly greater for TiUnite and Roxolid SLActive compared with OsseoSpeed implants (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Calibrated double wavelength laser irradiation did not critically influence the implant surface temperature. During laser irradiation the temperature decreased rapidly to steady‐state levels, close to the water/air‐spray temperature.