Safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC. We retrospectively collected data for NSCLC patients who received thoracic surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy from May 2020 to August 2022. Sur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in oncology Vol. 13; p. 1134713
Main Authors: Zeng, Jun, Yi, Bin, Chang, Ruimin, Chen, Yufan, Yu, Zhongjie, Gao, Yang
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 23-02-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC. We retrospectively collected data for NSCLC patients who received thoracic surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy from May 2020 to August 2022. Surgery details, pathological response, and perioperative outcome were compared between video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) group and RATS group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to equal the baseline characteristics. A total of 220 patients were divided into 78 VATS patients and 142 RATS patients. There was no 90-day mortality in either group. RATS patients demonstrated better results in conversion rate to thoracotomy (VATS vs. RATS: 28.2% vs. 7.5%, < 0.001), number of lymph node stations harvested (5.63 ± 1.75 vs. 8.09 ± 5.73, < 0.001), number of lymph nodes harvested (13.49 ± 9.325 vs. 20.35 ± 10.322, < 0.001), yield pathologic-N (yp-N) assessment (yp-N0, 88.5% vs. 67.6%; yp-N1, 7.6% vs. 12.6%; yp-N2, 3.8% vs. 19.7%; < 0.001), and visual analog scale pain score after surgery (4.41 ± 0.93 vs. 3.77 ± 1.21, =0.002). However, there were no significant differences in pathological response evaluation for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy ( = 0.493) and complication rate ( = 0.803). After IPTW-adjustment, these results remained constant. RATS reduced the risk of conversion to thoracotomy, provided a better yp-N stage evaluation, and improved pain score; this suggests that RATS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Surgical Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
These authors have contributed equally to this work
Reviewed by: Song Xu, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, China; Alberto Testori, Humanitas University, Italy
Edited by: Long Jiang, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, China
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1134713