MHC2TA rs4774C and HHV-6A active replication in multiple sclerosis patients

Background and purpose:  In a previous report, a strong gene–environment interaction between human herpesvirus 6A (HHV6A) active replication and MHC2TA rs4774C was demonstrated. The objectives of this study were: (i) to reappraise the association that was found in the previous study; (ii) to evaluat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of neurology Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 129 - 135
Main Authors: Alvarez-Lafuente, R., Martinez, A., Garcia-Montojo, M., Mas, A., De Las Heras, V., Dominguez-Mozo, M. I., Maria del Carmen, C., López-Cavanillas, M., Bartolome, M., Gomez de la Concha, E., Urcelay, E., Arroyo, R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-01-2010
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and purpose:  In a previous report, a strong gene–environment interaction between human herpesvirus 6A (HHV6A) active replication and MHC2TA rs4774C was demonstrated. The objectives of this study were: (i) to reappraise the association that was found in the previous study; (ii) to evaluate if MS patients with minor allele C and HHV‐6A active infection had different clinical behavior; and (iii) to analyze the possible association of MHC2TA rs4774C with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). Methods:  A total of 149 MS patients were analyzed both at the MHC2TA locus and by HHV‐6A status in serum. We studied a G/C polymorphism (rs4774) by a TaqMan Assay‐on‐Demand. HHV‐6A genomes in serum were evaluated by quantitative PCR. A control group of 562 healthy Spanish individuals was included for comparative purposes in the genetic analyses. A battery of clinical data was collected for all the MS patients included in the study. Results:  (i) MHC2TA/HHV‐6A interaction: we found the same strong association of the rs4774C allele with HHV‐6A active replication than in the previous study (P = 0.0001). (ii) Clinical data: the two main statistical significant differences for MS patients with HHV‐6A active infection and minor allele C were: (a) a significant number of them were not free of progression (EDSS = 0) 2 years after the diagnosis (P = 0.01); (b) only a third of them responded to interferon beta treatment (P = 0.05). Conclusions:  This study has verified previous results about the strong gene–environment interaction between HHV6A active replication and MHC2TA rs4774C. Furthermore, a different clinical behavior for MS patients with HHV‐6A active infection and minor allele C was found.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-PDLB5Q0C-Q
ArticleID:ENE2758
istex:E25FCFBBEB36AB92CC523B0AA755C028438CE32C
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1351-5101
1468-1331
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02758.x