Occupational exposure to bisphenol-A (BPA) and the risk of Self-Reported Male Sexual Dysfunction

BACKGROUND Animal studies have suggested that bisphenol-A (BPA) is a potential human endocrine disrupter; but evidence from human studies is needed. METHODS We conducted an occupational cohort study to examine the effect of occupational exposure to BPA on the risk of male sexual dysfunction. Current...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 519 - 527
Main Authors: Li, D., Zhou, Z., Qing, D., He, Y., Wu, T., Miao, M., Wang, J., Weng, X., Ferber, J.R., Herrinton, L.J., Zhu, Q., Gao, E., Checkoway, H., Yuan, W.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01-02-2010
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND Animal studies have suggested that bisphenol-A (BPA) is a potential human endocrine disrupter; but evidence from human studies is needed. METHODS We conducted an occupational cohort study to examine the effect of occupational exposure to BPA on the risk of male sexual dysfunction. Current workers from BPA-exposed and control factories were recruited. The exposed workers were exposed to very high BPA levels in their workplace. Male sexual function was ascertained through in-person interviews using a standard male sexual function inventory. RESULTS BPA-exposed workers had consistently higher risk of male sexual dysfunction across all domains of male sexual function than the unexposed workers. After controlling for matching variables and potential confounders, exposed workers had a significantly increased risk of reduced sexual desire [odds ratios (OR) = 3.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.8–8.6), erectile difficulty (OR = 4.5, 95% CI 2.1–9.8), ejaculation difficulty (OR = 7.1, 95% CI 2.9–17.6), and reduced satisfaction with sex life (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 2.3–6.6). A dose–response relationship was observed with an increasing level of cumulative BPA exposure associated with a higher risk of sexual dysfunction. Furthermore, compared with the unexposed workers, BPA-exposed workers reported significantly higher frequencies of reduced sexual function within 1 year of employment in the BPA-exposed factories. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide the first evidence that exposure to BPA in the workplace could have an adverse effect on male sexual dysfunction.
Bibliography:istex:8A5487D1313A92B49C64AAE7FB4C2E11941678C2
ArticleID:dep381
ark:/67375/HXZ-45RCBXW2-N
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep381