Recombinant transfer in the basic genome of Escherichia coli
An approximation to the â¼4-Mbp basic genome shared by 32 strains of Escherichia coli representing six evolutionary groups has been derived and analyzed computationally. A multiple alignment of the 32 complete genome sequences was filtered to remove mobile elements and identify the most reliable â...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 112; no. 29; pp. 9070 - 9075 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
21-07-2015
National Acad Sciences Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | An approximation to the â¼4-Mbp basic genome shared by 32 strains of Escherichia coli representing six evolutionary groups has been derived and analyzed computationally. A multiple alignment of the 32 complete genome sequences was filtered to remove mobile elements and identify the most reliable â¼90% of the aligned length of each of the resulting 496 basic-genome pairs. Patterns of single base-pair mutations (SNPs) in aligned pairs distinguish clonally inherited regions from regions where either genome has acquired DNA fragments from diverged genomes by homologous recombination since their last common ancestor. Such recombinant transfer is pervasive across the basic genome, mostly between genomes in the same evolutionary group, and generates many unique mosaic patterns. The six least-diverged genome pairs have one or two recombinant transfers of length â¼40â115 kbp (and few if any other transfers), each containing one or more gene clusters known to confer strong selective advantage in some environments. Moderately diverged genome pairs (0.4â1% SNPs) show mosaic patterns of interspersed clonal and recombinant regions of varying lengths throughout the basic genome, whereas more highly diverged pairs within an evolutionary group or pairs between evolutionary groups having >1.3% SNPs have few clonal matches longer than a few kilobase pairs. Many recombinant transfers appear to incorporate fragments of the entering DNA produced by restriction systems of the recipient cell. A simple computational model can closely fit the data. Most recombinant transfers seem likely to be due to generalized transduction by coevolving populations of phages, which could efficiently distribute variability throughout bacterial genomes.
A significant fraction of the length of Escherichia coli genomes comprises mobile elements integrated at various sites in a â¼4-Mbp basic genome shared by the species. We find that the entire basic genome is continually exchanged by homologous recombination with genome fragments acquired from other genomes in the population. Evolutionary groups appear to exchange DNA preferentially within the same group but also with other groups to different extents. Entering DNA is often fragmented by restriction systems of the recipient cell, with surviving pieces replacing homologous parts of the recipient chromosome. Coevolving populations of phages that package genome fragments and deliver them to cells that have appropriate receptors are likely mediators of most DNA transfers, distributing variability throughout the species. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510839112 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 PM-031; ELS165; Internal research funding; SC00112704 USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BNL-108341-2015-JA Contributed by F. William Studier, June 3, 2015 (sent for review February 20, 2015; reviewed by Richard E. Lenski and Lise Raleigh) 3Present address: Institute for Bioinformatics, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, 40221 Düsseldorf, Germany. 5Present address: Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801. Author contributions: F.W.S. and S.M. designed research; P.D.D., T.Y.P., F.W.S., and S.M. performed research; P.D.D., T.Y.P., F.W.S., and S.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; P.D.D., T.Y.P., F.W.S., and S.M. analyzed data; and P.D.D., F.W.S., and S.M. wrote the paper. 2Present address: Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032. 1P.D.D. and T.Y.P. contributed equally to this work. Reviewers: R.E.L., Michigan State University; and L.R., New England Biolabs. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1510839112 |