Cost-effectiveness of alpha-1 antitrypsin replacement therapy in treatment of congenital chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Alpha 1-antitrypsin (AAT) replacement therapy is an expensive intervention ($20,000-$30,000 per patient annually) which may slow or arrest the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in AAT-deficient patients. While FDA-approved, therapy efficacy is unknown. The costs and benefit...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of public health (1971) Vol. 81; no. 4; pp. 427 - 433 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Washington, DC
Am Public Health Assoc
01-04-1991
American Public Health Association |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Alpha 1-antitrypsin (AAT) replacement therapy is an expensive intervention ($20,000-$30,000 per patient annually) which may slow or arrest the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in AAT-deficient patients. While FDA-approved, therapy efficacy is unknown. The costs and benefits of AAT replacement therapy were evaluated for patients with congenital COPD.
Epidemiological and disease cost data were taken from published sources. A discrete-time model of disease stage probability transition was developed to calculate the present-value expected cost of disease treatment, under a range of possible therapy efficacy and other parameter values.
At an efficacy of 70 percent, the cost per life year saved with AAT replacement therapy would be between $28,000 and $72,000 (1990 US dollars), depending on patient age, sex, and smoking status. At 30 percent efficacy, the cost per life year saved range would be between $50,000 and $128,000. A controlled efficacy study would cost $53 million or less, if the true efficacy were 50 percent or better.
With efficacy of 30 percent or higher, therapy cost-effectiveness would be comparable to other widely used medical interventions. The economic assessment methodology was used to evaluate both the therapeutic innovation and the value of additional clinical research. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
DOI: | 10.2105/AJPH.81.4.427 |