Job market signaling of relative position, or Becker married to Spence

"This paper considers a matching model of the labor market where workers, who have private information on their quality, signal to firms that also differ in quality. Signals allow assortative matching in which the highest-quality workers send the highest signals and are hired by the best firms....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the European Economic Association Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 290 - 322
Main Author: Hopkins, Ed
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Wiley-Blackwell 01-04-2012
Blackwell Publishing Inc
Oxford University Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:"This paper considers a matching model of the labor market where workers, who have private information on their quality, signal to firms that also differ in quality. Signals allow assortative matching in which the highest-quality workers send the highest signals and are hired by the best firms. Matching is considered both when wages are rigid (nontransferable utility) and when they are fully flexible (transferable utility). In both cases, equilibrium strategies and payoffs depend on the distributions of worker and firm types. This is in contrast to separating equilibria of the standard model, which do not respond to changes in supply or demand. With sticky wages, despite incomplete information, equilibrium investment in education by low-ability workers can be inefficiently low, and this distortion can become worse in a more competitive environment. In contrast, with flexible wages, greater competition improves efficiency." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku). Forschungsmethode: Theoriebildung; Grundlagenforschung.
Bibliography:The editor in charge of this paper was Patrick Bolton.
Acknowledgements: This paper arose from joint research with Tatiana Kornienko on the economics of relative concerns. I would like to thank Tatiana, Tilman Börgers, Simon Clark, Melvyn Coles, Benny Moldovanu, Michael Peters, Andrew Postlewaite, József Sákovics, Larry Samuelson, Jeroen Swinkels, and Jonathan Thomas for helpful discussions. My apologies to Professors Becker and Spence. Errors remain my own. I acknowledge support from the Economic and Social Research Council, award reference RES‐000‐27‐0065.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1542-4766
1542-4774
1542-4774
DOI:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.01047.x