Implementation of High Resolution Whole Genome Array CGH in the Prenatal Clinical Setting: Advantages, Challenges, and Review of the Literature

• Published in: BioMed research international Vol. 2013; no. 2013; pp. 1 - 14
• Main Authors: Patsalis, Philippos C., Sismani, Carolina, Kallikas, Ioannis, Koumbaris, George, Antoniou, Pavlos, Ioannides, Marios, Moutafi, Maria, Alexandrou, Angelos, Evangelidou, Paola, Velissariou, Voula
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 01-01-2013; John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Hindawi Limited
• Subjects: Advantages; Amniocentesis; Amniotic fluid; Arrays; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis; Chromosome Disorders - genetics; Comparative genomic hybridization; Comparative Genomic Hybridization - methods; Cytogenetics; Diagnosis; Down syndrome; Female; Genetic aspects; Genetics; Genomes; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Karyotyping; Literature reviews; Mental retardation; Methods; Pregnancy; Prenatal development; Prenatal Diagnosis; Review; Ultrasonic imaging
• ISSN: 2314-6133; 2314-6141
• DOI: 10.1155/2013/346762

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization analysis is replacing postnatal chromosomal analysis in cases of intellectual disabilities, and it has been postulated that it might also become the first-tier test in prenatal diagnosis. In this study, array CGH was applied in 64 prenatal samples with whole genome oligonucleotide arrays (BlueGnome, Ltd.) on DNA extracted from chorionic villi, amniotic fluid, foetal blood, and skin samples. Results were confirmed with Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization or Real-Time PCR. Fifty-three cases had normal karyotype and abnormal ultrasound findings, and seven samples had balanced rearrangements, five of which also had ultrasound findings. The value of array CGH in the characterization of previously known aberrations in five samples is also presented. Seventeen out of 64 samples carried copy number alterations giving a detection rate of 26.5%. Ten of these represent benign or variables of unknown significance, giving a diagnostic capacity of the method to be 10.9%. If karyotype is performed the additional diagnostic capacity of the method is 5.1% (3/59). This study indicates the ability of array CGH to identify chromosomal abnormalities which cannot be detected during routine prenatal cytogenetic analysis, therefore increasing the overall detection rate. In addition a thorough review of the literature is presented.