Pediatric Kidney Transplant Experience in Ontario: A Review of Division of the Surgical and Medical Management Across Local Tertiary Care Institutions

• Published in: Canadian journal of kidney health and disease Vol. 7; p. 2054358120925712
• Main Authors: Kim, Jin K., Koyle, Martin A., Raveendran, Lucshman, Teoh, Chia Wei, Chua, Michael E., Ming, Jessica M., Farhat, Walid A., Hebert, Diane, Lorenzo, Armando J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-01-2020; Sage Publications Ltd; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Kidney diseases; Kidney transplants; Pediatrics; Resident Paper; Transplants & implants; kidney transplant; geographical distribution; pediatric
• ISSN: 2054-3581; 2054-3581
• DOI: 10.1177/2054358120925712

Background:
Our institution is the largest pediatric kidney transplantation (KT) center in Canada and the referral center for pediatric KT in Ontario. Pediatric KT recipients are referred to our center for KT and transferred back to their local tertiary care institutions for post-transplant care. This investigation assesses whether the current system of transferring patients back to their local tertiary care institutions following KT allows decreased burden and distribution of resources from a single centralized surgical center.
Methods:
A retrospective review of KT performed at our institution between 2000 and 2015 was performed. Patients were divided into those who began their chronic kidney disease (CKD) care at our institution and those who began their care elsewhere. Readmission to our institution within 1 year of KT for surgical and nonsurgical complications was compared. The geographical proximity of patients to our institution and institution of initial CKD care was assessed quantitatively and mapped visually.
Results:
Of 324 patients who underwent KT, 244 (75.3%) began their CKD care at our institution. Those who began their CKD care at other institutions had shorter initial admissions to our institution (17 [14-24] vs 14 [12-17], P < .0001) and were less likely to be readmitted to our institution for nonsurgical concerns at <6 months after transplant (P < .0001) and 6 to 12 months after transplant (P < .0001). There were similar readmissions for complications requiring surgical management. The relationship between the center of CKD initiation and readmission remained significant on multivariate analysis. There was a significant difference in distance (km) to our institution between the 2 groups (46 [interquartile range = 24-109] vs 203 [117-406], P < .0001).
Conclusion:
Patients who are geographically distanced from our institution began their CKD care at their closest institution and were managed effectively at those institutions following initial discharge/transfer of care, suggesting that there is an effective distribution of health care resources with regard to CKD and KT care.