Evaluation of a 5-day education programme in Type 1 diabetes: achieving individual targets with a patient-centred approach

Aims To evaluate if a single inpatient education training programme can achieve individualized therapeutic targets. Methods Patients with Type 1 diabetes participating in a flexible intensive therapy programme were consecutively included in a prospective monocentric study. They all participated in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetic medicine Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 500 - 503
Main Authors: Halbron, M., Sachon, C., Simon, D., Obadia, T., Grimaldi, A., Hartemann, A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-04-2014
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims To evaluate if a single inpatient education training programme can achieve individualized therapeutic targets. Methods Patients with Type 1 diabetes participating in a flexible intensive therapy programme were consecutively included in a prospective monocentric study. They all participated in the same education programme which had a patient‐centred approach. Before the intervention, patients were divided into three groups according to their main therapeutic target: Group 1, to decrease HbA1c concentration in patients with baseline HbA1c ≥ 58 mmol/mol (7.5%); Group 2, to improve quality of life and satisfaction with treatment in patients with baseline HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (7.5%); and Group 3, to decrease the frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes in patients with severe or frequent hypoglycaemic episodes. Therapeutic targets were evaluated at 12 months. Quality of life and treatment satisfaction were evaluated with validated questionnaires completed at baseline and 6 months. Results In Group 1 (n = 74), the mean ± sd HbA1c concentration decreased from 75 ± 15 mmol/mol (9.0 ±1.4%) to 68 ±15 mmol/mol (8.4 ± 1.4%; P < 0.001), with 53% of patients experiencing a decrease in HbA1c concentration of at least 6 mmol/mol (0.5%), without weight gain or more frequent hypoglycaemia. In Group 2 (n = 12), patient satisfaction with treatment improved significantly (P < 0.0001). In Group 3 (n = 35), minor hypoglycaemia significantly decreased from a mean ± sd of 6.6 ± 4.7 to 3.2 ± 3.0 hypoglycaemic episodes/week (P < 0.001) and the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia dropped significantly from a mean ± sd of 2.31 ± 3.07 to 0.86 ± 2.46 episodes/patient/year (P < 0.001). Conclusions Many patients with different needs, who attended the same flexible intensive therapy education programme, which had a patient‐centred approach, were able to achieve their individual therapeutic targets. What's new? Education programmes for patients with Type 1 diabetes are of major importance in routine hospital care but patients have differing requirements. Not all patients have poor glycaemic control; some have good glycaemic control but experience severe or frequent hypoglycaemia, and some have none of these problems but would like to enlarge their food choice without increasing their HbA1c levels. Our results suggest that a single inpatient education training programme, using a patient‐centred approach, could achieve patients' individual therapeutic targets.
Bibliography:istex:C59DBE9773A73126637B7D40CFE7F4C6BF2E0C2A
ArticleID:DME12372
ark:/67375/WNG-MJ4CXDZX-L
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0742-3071
1464-5491
DOI:10.1111/dme.12372