Effectiveness of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non-Native Freshwater Fishes, to Perform Risk Identification Assessments in the Iberian Peninsula

• Published in: Risk analysis Vol. 33; no. 8; pp. 1404 - 1413
• Main Authors: Almeida, David, Ribeiro, Filipe, Leunda, Pedro M., Vilizzi, Lorenzo, Copp, Gordon H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-08-2013
• Subjects: Algorithms; Alien species prescreening; Analysis of Variance; Animals; aquatic conservation; biological invasions; Categories; Conservation; Ecology; Ecology - methods; Environmental monitoring; Fish; Fishes; Fresh Water; Freshwater; Freshwaters; hazard identification; Introduced Species; Invasions; Nonnative species; Peninsulas; Reproducibility of Results; Risk; Risk Assessment; ROC Curve; Scoring; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spain; Species; Species Specificity; Studies; Wildlife conservation; Spain; Iberian Peninsula; Alien species prescreening; hazard identification; biological invasions; aquatic conservation
• ISSN: 0272-4332; 1539-6924
• DOI: 10.1111/risa.12050

Risk assessments are crucial for identifying and mitigating impacts from biological invasions. The Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) is a risk identification (screening) tool for freshwater fishes consisting of two subject areas: biogeography/history and biology/ecology. According to the outcomes, species can be classified under particular risk categories. The aim of this study was to apply FISK to the Iberian Peninsula, a Mediterranean climate region highly important for freshwater fish conservation due to a high level of endemism. In total, 89 fish species were assessed by three independent assessors. Results from receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that FISK can discriminate reliably between noninvasive and invasive fishes for Iberia, with a threshold of 20.25, similar to those obtained in several regions around the world. Based on mean scores, no species was categorized as “low risk,” 50 species as “medium risk,” 17 as “moderately high risk,” 11 as “high risk,” and 11 as “very high risk.” The highest scoring species was goldfish Carassius auratus. Mean certainty in response was above the category “mostly certain,” ranging from tinfoil barb Barbonymus schwanenfeldii with the lowest certainty to eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki with the highest level. Pair‐wise comparison showed significant differences between one assessor and the other two on mean certainty, with these two assessors showing a high coincidence rate for the species categorization. Overall, the results suggest that FISK is a useful and viable tool for assessing risks posed by non‐native fish in the Iberian Peninsula and contributes to a “watch list” in this region.