Durability and clinical impact of tricuspid valve procedures in patients receiving a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device

Abstract Objective Patients evaluated for a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device frequently present with severe right ventricular dysfunction with tricuspid regurgitation. Long-term outcomes of concurrent tricuspid valve procedures in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implanta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 151; no. 2; pp. 520 - 527.e1
Main Authors: Han, Jiho, BS, Takeda, Koji, MD, PhD, Takayama, Hiroo, MD, PhD, Kurlansky, Paul A., MD, Mauro, Christine M., PhD, Colombo, Paolo C., MD, Yuzefpolskaya, Melana, MD, Fukuhara, Shinichi, MD, Truby, Lauren K., MD, Topkara, Veli K., MD, Garan, Arthur R., MD, Mancini, Donna M., MD, Naka, Yoshifumi, MD, PhD
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-02-2016
Subjects:
RV
HR
TVP
RHF
CI
IQR
CPB
CVP
TR
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective Patients evaluated for a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device frequently present with severe right ventricular dysfunction with tricuspid regurgitation. Long-term outcomes of concurrent tricuspid valve procedures in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation are unclear. Methods From May 2004 to December 2013, 336 patients received continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Among these, 8 patients with prior tricuspid valve procedures were excluded. At continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation, 76 patients underwent tricuspid valve procedures (group A), including 68 repairs and 8 replacements. The remaining 252 patients did not receive concurrent tricuspid valve procedures (group B). Results Preoperatively, group A had higher central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ( P  = .032), total bilirubin ( P  = .009), and percentage of moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (98.7% vs 18.8%; P  < .001). In group A, cardiopulmonary bypass time (136 ± 52.0 minutes vs 83.9 ± 38.8 minutes; P  < .001), intraoperative platelet use (13.6 ± 6.70 units vs 11.7 ± 5.92 units; P  = .042), and bleeding requiring reoperation (27.5% vs 16.7%; P  = .046) were significantly increased. In-hospital mortality was similar (10.5% vs 6.4%; P  = .22). On-device 2-year survival was 73.9% in group A and 74.2% in group B ( P  = .24). At 2 years, mean cumulative readmissions for right heart failure was 0.21 in group A and 0.27 in group B ( P  = .95). A generalized linear mixed-effects model showed that tricuspid valve procedures are protective for developing future significant tricuspid regurgitation (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.76; P  = .006). Conclusions Concomitant tricuspid valve procedures at continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation can be performed safely and are protective against worsening tricuspid regurgitation during the first 2 years of support.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.082