Uncertainty and agency in COVID-19 hotel quarantine in Australia

• Published in: SSM. Qualitative research in health Vol. 2; p. 100034
• Main Authors: Williams, Jane, Gilbert, Gwendolyn, Dawson, Angus, Kaldor, John, Hendrickx, David, Haire, Bridget
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-12-2022; The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd; Elsevier
• Subjects: COVID-19; Empirical bioethics; Qualitative research; Quarantine; COVID-19; Qualitative research; Quarantine; Empirical bioethics
• ISSN: 2667-3215; 2667-3215
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2021.100034

Mandatory 14-day hotel COVID-19 quarantine was introduced for international arrivals into Australia in late March 2020, with no precedent and little time to prepare. This public health initiative was a key factor in Australia's relatively low COVID-19 burden in the first 18 months of the pandemic. We conducted an empirical bioethics study exploring the experience of people who had quarantined in hotels in Australia. We used in depth interviews to develop an understanding of context and normative analysis to consider whether the way the program is conducted is ethically justifiable. 58 people participated; they had been in hotel quarantine in different parts of Australia in the period March 2020–January 2021. Participants faced considerable uncertainty while in quarantine and many experienced this as burdensome. Some uncertainty resulted from not being given information about key aspects of quarantine, some from rules that changed frequently or were otherwise inconsistent, some from being physically isolated. Lack of information and uncertainty contributed to diminished agency. Communication efforts made by individual hotels was well received. Earlier ethics literature about quarantine does not take into account the context our participants described, where the hotel and supervision arrangements were central to the experience. We argue that more suitable arrangements must be made if quarantine is to be an ongoing proposition.