Protist distribution in the Western Fram Strait in summer 2010 based on 454-pyrosequencing of 18S rDNA

In this study, we present the first comprehensive analyses of the diversity and distribution of marine protist (micro‐, nano‐, and picoeukaryotes) in the Western Fram Strait, using 454‐pyrosequencing and high‐pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) at five stations in summer 2010. Three stations (T1;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of phycology Vol. 49; no. 5; pp. 996 - 1010
Main Authors: Kilias, Estelle, Wolf, Christian, Nöthig, Eva-Maria, Peeken, Ilka, Metfies, Katja
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-10-2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this study, we present the first comprehensive analyses of the diversity and distribution of marine protist (micro‐, nano‐, and picoeukaryotes) in the Western Fram Strait, using 454‐pyrosequencing and high‐pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) at five stations in summer 2010. Three stations (T1; T5; T7) were influenced by Polar Water, characterized by cold water with lower salinity (<33) and different extents of ice concentrations. Atlantic Water influenced the other two stations (T6; T9). While T6 was located in the mixed water zone characterized by cold water with intermediate salinity (~33) and high ice concentrations, T9 was located in warm water with high salinity (~35) and no ice‐coverage at all. General trends in community structure according to prevailing environmental settings, observed with both methods, coincided well. At two stations, T1 and T7, characterized by lower ice concentrations, diatoms (Fragilariopsis sp., Porosira sp., Thalassiosira spp.) dominated the protist community. The third station (T5) was ice‐covered, but has been ice‐free for ~4 weeks prior to sampling. At this station, dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae 1, Woloszynskia sp. and Gyrodinium sp.) were dominant, reflecting a post‐bloom situation. At station T6 and T9, the protist communities consisted mainly of picoeukaryotes, e.g., Micromonas spp. Based on our results, 454‐pyrosequencing has proven to be an adequate tool to provide comprehensive information on the composition of protist communities. Furthermore, this study suggests that a snap‐shot of a few, but well‐chosen samples can provide an overview of community structure patterns and succession in a dynamic marine environment.
Bibliography:Fig. S1. Seasonal development of area-averaged chlorophyll a concentration at, obtained by remote sensing observations. Two different areas have been selected: 12°W - 4°W, 78°N - 80° N, solid line, representing the stations T1, T5, T7, and 5°W - 0°E, 78°N - 80° N, scattered line, representing T6 and T9, respectively. The period of our investigation is enclosed by the square (18-23 July). Concentrations are derived from MODIS data.Table S1. Coordinates, chlorophyll a and ice content of surface water samples along the transect.Table S2. 454-pyrosequencing - OTU read distribution.
istex:FB44B8127C96BD340C31252BA7FF26295E9A4135
ArticleID:JPY12109
ark:/67375/WNG-74F261MS-W
Initiative and Networking Fund
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3646
1529-8817
DOI:10.1111/jpy.12109